Social Question

Adirondackwannabe's avatar

Why would you burn a Picasso, or any other art like that?

Asked by Adirondackwannabe (36713points) August 9th, 2013

I don’t know if you saw the story, but some thieves stole some amazing paintings from a Rotterdam museum. Monet’s, Picasso’s and more. And the mother of one of the suspects burned the art in her stove to “protect her son”. Are you frigging insane lady?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

10 Answers

YARNLADY's avatar

A lot of precious art disappears during wars.

Some governments deliberately destroy art to erase the past of groups that are out of favor.

I, personally wouldn’t do it, but that woman thought she could get rid of the evidence of a crime.

talljasperman's avatar

The Amber Room might be in ashes in a stove somewhere.

rojo's avatar

I don’t know, I would burn a Picasso.

Not the Monet however; that is art.

anartist's avatar

I would burn the art if I were Picasso and I felt like it was not a successful work.

however, more to the point, flogging stolen artwork is quite difficult [because the works and their provenance are known] and maybe if the thieves [who don’t value the art, only the money it could bring in] were totally unable to unload it, they might destroy it to protect themselves.

Berserker's avatar

Read the story, seems to me the painting was burned in order to get rid of the evidence. Had nothing to do with some symbolic action against the arts. You’d be surprised what people will do to avoid the law. Read this story once, this dude was getting chased by the police, and when he saw he couldn’t get away, he stopped his car…and drew a mustache on his face with a pen. When he got out of the car he was like, hey guys, nice day, huh?

As for burning anything because you don’t like it, such as has been done with bibles, korans or Harry Potter books; the reasons behind this aren’t even worth pondering. Burning evidence to protect someone may be stupid, but it wasn’t some dumbass political/religious message or nothing. Just someone desperate, I guess.

_Whitetigress's avatar

The answer to your op for me is because one has to be unappreciative n order to burn them.

downtide's avatar

The mother clearly rates her son’s safety above the value of the painting. As a parent myself, I might feel the same way. Then again if my daughter was stupid enough to steal valuable paintings, I might not.

ucme's avatar

To piss on the hideously pretentious, overhyped, overpriced snobbery that attaches itself to the fine arts, it’s just paintings at the end of the day.

flip86's avatar

Picasso was a horrible artist. I’d burn it without a second thought.

filmfann's avatar

Picasso is pure genius. To burn anything of his is a crime against art.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther