Political Correctness, and common courtesy are two different things.
Political Correctness is a handy method of suppressing political ideas, without having to go through the nasty business of burning your opponant at the stake, or throwing them in prison or something.
In that regard, when I am being politically incorrect, I believe I am commiting a morally proper act of civil disobedience against an onerous practice. In that case I am indeed proud to do it.
The way to tell the difference between Political Correctness, and common courtesy, is to observe which “direction” it goes.
If I say something that can be equally interpreted as offensive by anybody, regardless of gender, race, faith or party, then we are talking about common courtesy. Anybody can be discourteous, anybody can be hurt. Including me. It is not a good thing to try to be impolite.
Political Correctness, however, is not a universal concern. Unlike common courtesy, it only points one way.
For example, anybody can say any rude thing that they want to about white male Republicans, who are straight, and go to church on Sunday. To observe this fact, check out about every other thread on Fluther. Political Correctness obviously does not apply in that case.
However, we are admonished to be careful about making objective, if slightly uncomfortable, observations about anyone who is willfully ineffective, stupid, or a member of a (real or imagined) victim “class”, and that includes their vote hungry enablers in Washington. That simply won’t do.
I wonder why? Why do some people merit this polite consideration, and others are worthy only of crude scorn?
Whatever it is, I don’t agree with it. I am happy to be part of the opposition to it.
BTW, if I have ever announced up front that I was about to be politically incorrect, I must have been tired or something. I would hope that it would be obvious.