This situation would most likely not lead to a removal—this is more “informal correction” material. Meaning the social worker would say “These changes need to take place soon. I’ll come and check on them. If they don’t change, we’ll figure out why you can’t do it and try to help you do it.”
PLEASE people stop assuming that when someone says “call social services” it means “put in foster care”. It’s getting a bit tedious to read people posting over and over again about institutionalized care when several people have mentioned over again that its most likely not going to happen in this case.
This person is:
a. showing poor judgement—letting a delayed child take care of a toddler is very poor judgement.
b. making the same mistake repeatedly. She may be trying new things, but the old things keep happening over and over.
c. this repeaded mistake is potentially lethal. YES @ninjacolin I know a child can die in the home. I just posted about that happening recently to a very good couple friend of mine who lost their daughter because she way playing and got trapped in an airtight toybox in the middle of the night. In light of this, I found your post VERY condescending. You can’t bubble wrap your kids. Please don’t assume that just because I say that letting your kid REPEATEDLY go outside unattended is potentially lethal that I am some sort of helicopter parent who thinks you can protect them from anything.
I mean, kids can fall down and skin their knees and get them bloody no matter how careful you are. That doesn’t mean that you might as well leave razor blades all over the floor because they’re just going to get hurt anyway.
If you are making a mistake a LARGE number of times that is potentially lethal, you have a higher risk than the average parent. I’m not exaggerating about it being lethal. I live in a neighborhood with a ton of kids under 5 who play in the cul-de-sacs. I’ve driven around these kids. They are VERY hard to see over the car’s dashboard because they are too short. They also dart quickly. I’ve seen kids “vanish” in my line of sight. I knew they were right in front of me, but I couldn’t see them at all. If I were talking on my phone, driving a little too fast or just not paying attention, I could have hit them.
At least when there is a parent about, they almost always call out to the kids “There’s a car coming!” and the kids will freeze, and look around for the car. It’s better if they just freeze than if they try to move. Seriously, they can be hard to see if they are short enough. The less they move the better. But I have also noticed that if a parent doesn’t call out, the kids mostly ignore the cars if they are really young. They just don’t know the danger.
An unsupervised child under 5 years old is short, darts doesn’t have anyone helping them look for cars. This is very dangerous. I don’t think that even the most free-range of parents would ever approve of a 3 year old strolling through the neighborhoods unattended.
This is really serious stuff. And honestly, I think it’s a shame you are slamming on the husband like that. If I were her husband I’d be mad as hell if that kept happening on her watch. I’d probably come off as an overbearing jackass too and wouldn’t trust her with driving or anything else.
I don’t care how nice she seems. She’s making stupid mistakes that could kill her child. No kidding around about that.