@rfo1946- I’m an Audiologist and Hearing Aid Dispenser in an Ear, Nose and Throat Doctors office – so I am independent of any manufacturers and we don’t participate with any groups that give us quotas or incentives to use a particular manufacturer. A patient’s hearing loss and their ability to process and organize auditory information are crucial in choosing a make and model of hearing aid. Other factors are the size and shape of the ear canals and auricles, and the patient’s ability to handle and manipulate the different sizes and styles.
Since you are an experienced user of custom in-the-ear (ITE) instruments, you might find them easier to get in and out of the ears. That is one of the ‘pros’ of ITEs. Some ITEs can be made so tiny they fit so deep in the ear canal that they are not visible. This style is called Invisible In-the-Canal (IIC), but due to size they have some power limitations.
Taking the electronics and tucking them behind the auricle takes them away from the heat, humidity, and wax in the ear canal (a hostile environment for electronics and audio equipment). It also removes the microphones from the ear canal opening, which helps reduce whistling feedback. Not filling the ear with the electronics also allows is to leave the ear canal more open, which eases some of the occlusion issues that many people experience with ITEs. Some devices use disposable silicone tips that are very flexible, and soft or hard custom earmolds are also an option.
A traditional behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid has ALL the technology behind the ear, and the sound is pushed through a tube that goes into the ear. This style is best for people with frequent moisture or wax, or who have tiny ear canals or problems with comfort of things in their ears from sensitivity or TMJ issues.
The most popular and newest style these days is the Receiver-In-the-Canal (RIC) style. It’s the ‘happy medium’ option. Most of the electronics are behind the ear, but instead of pushing the sound through a tube, there is a speaker wire that runs down to the speaker that is placed into the ear canal. This is more cosmetically appealing and it allows the greatest separation of microphones and receiver, which is best for feedback reduction and produces a very cleaner sound with a little less power than a BTE does.
Usually the first question I ask my experienced patients is what they like and dislike about their current and previous devices, and what they wish hearing instruments could do. Choosing between manufacturers again will usually depend on the patient’s preferences for sound and their auditory processing abilities. If you’ve been happy with your Starkey devices, you may well prefer to stick with them. I find that Phonak has similar sound quality and features. Oticon and ReSound have a somewhat different amplification philosophy and tend to give more sound in the high frequencies. These are the 4 major manufacturers with which I am most familiar. The other top manufacturer in the US is Siemens, and they own their own hearing aid chain so many independent practices don’t carry them because of competition.
There is a ton of information on the web, and you’ll find users who love or hate a particular device or manufacturer for one reason or another – just like any other technologies, from cell phones to blenders to cars. So my advice is to work with an Audiologist that is independent and carries several brands and has a good trial period policy so you could try something and exchange it if you’re not happy.