Haven’t yet read any of the other answers, will do so after posting.
I liken tatoos to mutilation.
Some (but not most) of the art is rather beautiful, but the idea of using needles to permanently squirt ink into one’s skin is revolting to me. Even though they are considered to be style, it’s simply not the same thing as having a particular hairdo or a certain fashion.
Most of the tatoos I see on people (and they’re on a lot of people, male and female under the age of 50 in California) look very silly or very ugly. Most of the time I see them, it just makes the people look dirty. Sometimes, especially when women get one on the back of their calf, often look like a big bruise to me, until I get up closer and see that it’s just Mickey Mouse or a flower.
The other day, I saw this young lady, who was wearing shorts. From about 10 feet away, I thought she must have been in a terrible accident, because it looked like she had been cut open and then stitched back up from one ankle up her entire leg, and them back down the other leg clear to her other ankle. When I got a little bit closer, I could see that it was a vine with some leaves. It was really dreadful.
Also, people change over the years, so what might be extremely important right this minute, enough to make you want to get some picture or writing put permanently onto one’s body, makes me nervous and sad for them, knowing that things change, ideas change, what’s important often changes, and styles and fads change. I’m going to feel sorry for the folks with the visible tattoos, when and if, having clean clear skin ever comes back into style.
I’m an artist. I paint and draw and take photographs, but my body is not a canvas. It’s my actual, real body and I try my best to take care of it. The idea of mutilating my skin with needles and ink is completely counter to that idea.