@ragingloli Powerful electromagnet.
To detect something so small through so much material (taking the needle could be on the bottom), it would have to be a magnet of great size needing a crane to position it; and it still may not be able to pull it up.
Burn the haystack, then run the ashes through a sieve.
Burning the haystack is on the road partially to solving the problem, however, trying to pick up all the ashes might be over kill depending on where the stack was, or the needle could be missed while transferring material.
Take the entire stack, and throw it into a pool. The needle will sink to the bottom.
What happens if the hay sinks to the bottom too? Then you will have an underwater haystack covering an underwater needle. If the hay doesn’t sink, then it will float and get in the way of you seeing any sinking needle on the bottom.
@Smitha Metal detector
A metal detector by itself with nothing done to the stack I would think ineffective. If there is several feet of hay over the needle, maybe the metal detector would miss it. If you had to scatter the stack to make it thinner and thus give the detector a better chance at finding it, it can be very time consuming.
@Pachy Walk barefooted through the haystack one time. I guarantee your foot will find that needle.
But if the needle is in the middle of the stack, even the weight of walking on it would not be enough to put pressure on the needle under several feet of hay to feel it.
@glacial @jazmina88 (See above for magnets)
@ibstubro A match and a magnet.
You have two of the items but no process on what to do with them.
So, one way to do it is to burn down the haystack, then grid it off and go over it with a powerful magnet, moving section by section. The second way to do it is like the first only you use a very good quality metal detector section by section to find it. But burning down the haystack is the quickest option, or at least the one that takes the lowest effort.