@XCNuse, Windows is “built and sold cheaply”, eh?
Will all due respect, please allow me to call you out on that crapola…
The cheapest Vista is Microsoft Windows Vista™ Home Basic for $199.
By comparison, you can get Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard for a paltry $129.
And if you actually want all the features available in Vista, well you gotta pay out the ying yang for Microsoft Windows Vista™ Ultimate for $319.
(Excuse me, coughrip offcough)
Oh yah, that’s right. Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard already is the full-featured do-anything version. Still just $129.
And guess what, when Intel won’t deploy Vista because “Intel information technology staff just found no compelling case for adopting Vista,” well, things just ain’t looking all that great for Vista. It does not deliver on its promises.
—
I’m in full agreement with getting the right OS and hardware to do the right job. But I temper that with the old adage that any job worth doing is worth doing right. For Windows, about the only thing that comes close to that, in my book, are:
—1— enterprise/legacy applications for which there exist no alternative support platform (including web sites that do not conform to web standards, requiring IE6 or 7.)
—2— games.
For the average consumer, that’s right, about the only thing I think a PC is good for is playing games. And then, it’s only for the newest games for which one simply cannot wait for a port to a console or Mac.
—
[ This quip written on a Dell Latitude running Windows XP because of reason #1 ]