@SQUEEKY2: “and I guess I can just keep pasting them if you don’t believe me if you don’t believe me”
You are making a claim, yet have failed to support that claim with data. I have given you the benefit of the doubt that it’s possible that there has been an increase in car accidents or auto-related deaths since the release of the iPhone in 2007. I just haven’t seen the data. Let me try…
- deaths per year
– it appears from here that motor vehicle deaths decreased every year from 2007 to 2011. But 2012 saw a big increase. If you are going to make your case, maybe you could start here – dig into this data and see if the 2012 increase is a trend.
But as I have outlined in my case against techno-panic above, I don’t particularly care if we do see an increase in accidents. People who do not pay attention while driving should not have a license to drive (and likely should spend the rest of their horrible days in jail). If someone gets in the car and is worried about a fight they got in with their girlfriend, or is drinking coffee or talking with a passenger, they are putting me and my family at risk and the world would be a better place without them.
I’m 42. From 1988 to 2007 most of the people I have shared the road with have been terrible, worthless people doing shitty things when they should have been spending all of their efforts trying to keep from killing me. Tomorrow, when the next technology arrives and people are distracted with that, can we be honest about it and realize that the people who would drive while distracted are the people who will drive while distracted?
@turtlesandbox: “I see a lot of parents looking at Facebook on their phone instead of paying attention to their child that is singing, dancing, playing baseball or receiving an award. It’s really sad. Their eyes would have been on their child instead Facebook if they didn’t have that phone in their hand.”
This is a pervasive idea, but I find it less than compelling. The same concept applies. Parents who are not there for their kids and choose to spend their time f*cking around with their phones are not people who would be great, attentive parents if it were not for the invention of smartphones.
And as @flip86 alludes to (“Sure, people make phone calls, but that is not a disconnect from reality.”), there is something deeper here that I find confusing. This anti-tech bent that people seem to have is based in a few assumptions that I find puzzling….
1. How is a shift in communication methods less “real” than previous communication methods?
2. Exactly what technologies are ok and allow us to remain “connected to reality”? Can we lump automobiles (& trucks), television, printing press, pens, pencils, telephone, etc into this bucket?
3. Do you really believe that a significant portion of the population has ever had any interest in “connecting to reality”? It’s safe to say that it appears that most of the U.S. population is sleepwalking, and has been well before the 2007 iPhone apocalypse.