@thorninmud “Social cohesion” isn’t some official Fluther criterion.
It certainly seems like a de facto criterion.
Because we allow these fractious questions, we need to allow questions that provide a venue where those differences can be set aside and connections can be solidified in a playful environment.
Because the though provoking questions can cause those who can’t chew the meat to digress into name-calling, insults and the like, useless fluff gets almost a free pass because everyone is sitting around _kumbayaing My blame the question because some Jellies can’t take the heat but are not smart enough to get out of the kitchen; much less go in there in the 1st place?
Polling threads typically don’t.
And game questions do? For lack of a better example I can think of right now, TJBM threads where does the discourse come from in those; you are locked into a stringent profile to keep the thread going. It isn’t like you are going to comment or ask question about the vehicle, vacation, etc. that was mentioned before because it breaks the method of the thread. How is that more open than a question that has ‘A’, ‘B’, or ‘C’? If one is creative enough, they can say quite a bit in that question contract.
@GloPro There are not very many polling questions on Fluther at all.
Nearly every question in Social is a de facto polling question; there is no way around it. If someone ask what is the best car to buy for $35,000 it has a polling aspect to it. The only thing it is not doing is limiting the amount of participants, or limiting the number of vehicles that can be selected. It is still asking a pool of people which vehicle they think is best to buy for $35,000. At some point you can extrapolate data from that thread; X amount say Audi Quattro, X amount say BMW whatever, X amount say Infinity something, it may not be a tight poll, but it is still a poll.
@Seaofclouds When someone asks ” Do you want A or B?” they are polling, not asking for a discussion, especially when the OP then argues and complains about other options people add since they don’t like the two options presented in the question.
Certainly we never had questions like that here even if they did not point out the options or held to it stringently. In the aforementioned question, no one is obstructed from commenting on why they chose which option they chose or why it is better. If they did not like any of the options why even bother answering the question? Would anyone waste time doing that in the real word? If they went to a function and the menu had three meals to choose from and that was it; pasta, steak, or an eggplant dish. If you did not like any of them and asked why they did not have fish, and were told why, would you sit around telling them they were stupid for not giving fish lovers a choice or that they had something against fish and that is why they did not put it on the menu? They would either choose what was on the menu, or wait until later to eat. It is not complicated.
That is what we mean by polling questions and why we don’t allow them.
So any polling questions, of which there are many, that doesn’t stick to the hard context of a polling question is a polling question that is allowed to fly?
@turtlesandbox And ”either or” questions is not the same as an ‘A’ or ‘B’ question? Still seems like a polling question to me, just some frivolous one (for lack of a better word), people like.