@JLeslie: by your standard, ”Rape is used to control men and women on the opposing side during war, it is a tactic,” it sounds like you acknowledge that rape is used during wartime. Isn’t that sufficient for an axiom like war triggers rape?
Re ”Trigger to me means the man has it in him to harm women and he follows his inclination to do it. I think plenty of men would never want to rape a woman ever”: that sounds right-ish to me. Note that I didn’t say every man who enters a warzone immediately becomes a rapist. But, yes, many do.
I think it’s likely that engaging in war-like behavior, which violence is, creates what could crudely be called fuck-urges. Some soldiers will not act on those fuck urges until they get home to girlfriends/wives. Some will masturbate. Some will fuck each other. Some will fuck locals consensually, either by seduction or by hiring them as prostitutes. And some will rape.
Re ”To me that is not a trigger that is circumstance and I assume that man does not get a rush from it but is sickened by it”: in most circumstances, this is unlikely. Ordering soldiers to rape is kind of blatant, and if there is peer pressure it means there is already a great deal of it going on. This means they are probably doing it because of an instinct to propagate themselves. Men risk their own death in war, so it’s natural for them to want to propagate themselves.
Re ”Just like men who inadvertantly kill civilians during war. The war does not trigger them to want to kill, it is their circumstance”: they may not want to kill under normal circumstances, but they learn to kill and may have urges to kill for various reasons.
Re ”Some men like the idea of killing, especially if they see that person as the enemy”: and you can see why these men might self-select to become soldiers and police officers, right?
@SecondHandStoke: do you favor killing their children too?