[NSFW] To be known mainly as for an attribute or a body part seen as sexual, or erotic, is it worse for guys or for gals?

I reckon they’re about the same and the examples you gave made me chunder a little – do people really talk that way?.!

I believe it’s just harder for women in general since they’re probably always conscious of being seen by men as sexual objects. I can’t imagine how I’d cope thinking every man I encountered daily might possibly be thinking “indecent thoughts” about me.

Ewwwwww!

Who the heck are you mixing with? Do people you know really use such names? I don’t think either group of names is okay. Weird!

Trying to remember the last time I heard this…“the guy who can French kiss a grape from the back of a pussy”…

I can honestly say that no one – no one – that I have known has ever used that terminology at all. Maybe it’s my patrician upbringing.

I would find it offensive about people of either gender. But saying something like that reflects far more poorly on the speaker than it does on the object of the speech.

These are mostly new to me, mostly, but I have heard people refer to women as Sugar Tits, Mud Flaps, Big Boobs, and Flat. On the flip, guys have been referred to as Dickless, Pencil Dick, and Octopus.
It amuses me that the examples you give for guys are all generous to his physical features, while I usually hear derogatory comments.

Women. Men are driven sexually so it doesn’t bother us so much to be seen as meat.

I knew two good friends who referred to each other as “Sugar Tits” and “Honey Twat” but these were more terms of endearment that what you are positing.

@rojo – I trust they were both female?

Yep.

Had it been two guys the monikers would have been derogatory. Something like “Nutless Wonder” and “Stubby” because that’s the way men roll.

For some reason women seem to be much more complementary.

I find it interesting that the terms you used to refer to men required physical experience with that man in order to know what he can do, or how he is hung (which it strictly a male hang up, btw.) The terms you used for women are plain to see to everyone.

As a female, I’d be very upset if a man I’d slept with announce my sexual prowess (or lack of) to the whole world.

It certainly doesn’t seem to bother Ron Jeremy much. He seems quite delighted. (and considering he isn’t the most handsome looking guy on the planet, it’s no small wonder.)

And he doesn’t seem to be that well endowed in the brains DEPT. either :)

@Buttonstc – he’s not that stupid – has a masters degree in Education, was a teacher for a while, and has somehow figure out how to make money in porn for the last 34 years.

He may not be Albert Einstein, but he’s no George W Bush, either.

@all Has anyone heard ”She can suck a bowling ball through X ft. of garden hose” pray tell?

@Dutchess_III As a female, I’d be very upset if a man I’d slept with announce my sexual prowess (or lack of) to the whole world.
Not the whole world, but maybe the club, bar, health club locker room, etc. If women only knew how much of their bedroom gymnastics become bragging rights to the guy that rode them hard and put them away wet, they might not be in such a rush to be boinking by the 3rd date, or giving BJ as the new 2nd base.

@elbanditoroso

That’s interesting to know.

My impression of him was largely formed when he participated in one of those reality shows where a bunch of third rate celebrities all live together in a house for a few months.

He basically acted like a dolt the whole time, not exactly an intellectual heavyweight.

So, that’s pretty much the sum total of my knowledge of Ron Jeremy.

I wonder why he chose to present himself that way? Interesting.

Do you know where he taught or whom; for how long? I’m just curious.

(and as for figuring out how to make money in porn for 34 years, had he not been endowed by nature with an unusually large member, his career in porn would have been quite short, if at all.) He was basically just using what he was born with in an industry that places a high value on precisely that. That doesn’t really take an unusual amt. of brains to figure out.

He got dealt a lucky card of physical anatomy and he played it in an industry where it is highly valued.

What a world you live in @Hypocrisy_Central. Remember that comment I made a few days ago.
Man “I want sex / blow job / whatever.”
Woman “Ok!”
Man “You slut.”

@Dutchess_III What a world you live in @Hypocrisy_Central.
The human world, there have been many times I learned details of women I knew but were not friends through men I either knew who were friends, or just men I knew, such as ”she is a screamer”, ”she is multi-orgasmic”, ”she moans loudly when I do [blank]”, etc. Some guys, don’t know how many, feel the need to compare notes, or try to keep up with the ”sexual Jones”. If it was just a hookup, the details flow quicker and maybe embellished more. If she is the girl right now, and not the forever girl, their tongues are not mute totally. It is not Vegas that what happens between the sheets, stay between the sheets. How you oraled a guy last night might be front page news over a billiard game the next day or day after that.

Oooh. A new verb. “To oral.’’

Just to be clear, this is not something every male does. I don’t brag or compare notes and neither do any of my male friends. ‘Course, in the interest of full disclosure, we are all married so, maybe….........

and btw, I think it looks better with two “L’s” as in oralled…............ and analled.

^ [...and btw, I think it looks better with two “L’s” as in oralled…............ and analled.
Yeah, it looks better, but what would the need for the extra ‘L’ be?

” Happy as a dog with two, um, L’s?”