Social Question

Dutchess_III's avatar

What are your thoughts on the "Banned Books" feed that has been circulating on Facebook?

Asked by Dutchess_III (47126points) September 26th, 2014

There was book called “Fanny Hill or Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure.” It was written in 1748. It was banned in 1821, and again in 1963. It was the last book ever banned by the American government, and it is no longer banned.

Quite often, if you research a little, the books that are supposedly “banned” have simply been taken off of some school’s required reading list. If a majority of parents want this, isn’t it their right to make it so? The book is still available, student’s just aren’t required to read it.

So what are your thoughts on this? Are they making a mountain out of a mole hill, like FB loves to do?

Wiki list of banned books

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

7 Answers

janbb's avatar

Banned Books Week is an event organzied by the American Library Association – when they are not too busy shelving books. It doesn’t just mean books that have been banned by the US government; it means books that have been taken off of library shelves because of patron or parents or school board complaints.

Dutchess_III's avatar

But isn’t that their business?

janbb's avatar

Actually, librarians feel it is their duty to provide books that the majority of their readers want access to and feel they have made professional choices based on their expertise. If parents don’t want their kids reading certain books, they don’t need to allow them to take those books out. Simiarly, fi adults don’t want to read certain books, they don’t need to take them out either.

elbanditoroso's avatar

Any book that has been banned is almost certainly worth reading.

Dutchess_III's avatar

Well, all the books on this supposed list are absolute classics that I’d want my kids to read. Huck Finn, Grapes of Wrath, stuff like that.

I’d send my kids to Dillons to rent movies. If they tried to check out an R rated movie, the clerk would call to get my ok. :) I okay’d about half of them.

stanleybmanly's avatar

Banning books is worse than merely a waste of time. It’s downright stupid, and regressive, particularly when it comes to kids. Anything that a kid is curious enough to want to read should be put in front of him or her with dispatch. A couple of years ago, I was at a party where a woman was worrying about her 14 year old son’s lack of any interest in reading. A man that knew the family commented that the situation was strange, because the family had a huge library of books on religious topics. When I suggested that she get the kid a subscription to “Playboy”, the temperature in the room dropped 30 degrees. When my kids were coming up, I declared I would buy them any book they wanted to read. True to form, both the boy and girl immediately set out to bankrupt me with comic book subscriptions. The boy was 16 before it dawned on him that he could get Playboy and Penthouse for nothing, and the girl was extorting money for textbooks through graduate school. My son made the mistake of telling his 2 boys the story of the “promise”, and my daughter in law threatened him with death on the spot.

Dutchess_III's avatar

Well, I disagree with you. A friend’s 6 year old daughter was molested at a doctor’s office by the doctor’s son, who was 14. An investigation turned up the fact that the doctor had a monthly subscription to Playboy and to Penthouse. The investigator’s figured that contributed to the molestation.
I wouldn’t suggest giving a kid, whose hormones are raging, unlimited access to porn. That kind of thing, at that age, helps determine a kid’s attitude towards women and sex. Then you wind up with questions on Fluther like, “What do I do when I’m being sexually harassed in public?”

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther