General Question

ibstubro's avatar

Would you participate on a Q&A site that required you to make a substantive answer to a question before you could see the other user's answers?

Asked by ibstubro (18804points) October 4th, 2014

“Substantive” as defined by a mod or excellent bot.

I think that site has value. If all the answers were the same, you have a consensus.
If the answers are all over the board, you have a true controversy.

People would, theoretically, answer to their ability, rather than trying for originality or simply playing off another member’s answer.

Has this been done?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

13 Answers

cookieman's avatar

I like the basic concept, but would prefer to eliminate the whole modded-substantive-answer part. How about you just can’t see the other answers until you’ve answered. You could still have mods to enforce basic rules and writing standards, similar to Fluther.

elbanditoroso's avatar

No, I wouldn’t.

First, it relies on the integrity of the moderator. If he/she has the sole right to decide what is a substantial answer, then he/she has the right to slant the conversation in the way he/she wants. It’s basically censorship, albeit at a somewhat higher level. But it isn’t the free and unfettered flow of information and discussion, for sure.

Second, I often learn things from the casual and brief discussions that take place here. Even the ones that I disagree with. Requiring a “quality level”, while altruistic, actually reduces the value of a Q&A site.

Coloma's avatar

Hell no, I participate for the spice and diversity of discussion, I would have no motivation to participate if I was unable to access, upfront, others input and opinion. Part of a discussion is to actually discuss, interject ones own perspective and play off of others contributions. 10 thumbs down on this idea. Too controlling and I’m a go with the flow type.

If I wanted to have my every word censored and talk to myself I would still be married. lol

LDRSHIP's avatar

I think it is a brilliant idea. I like the concept.

It serves a purpose in its own way. I agree that as it is now is fine. But this concept would be an interesting an addition, not change how most Q&A work currently, but rather another an extra option.

I believe what @cookieman said makes sense in that perhaps you either remove the definition of how a mod is to determine “substantive” I would so implementing by a structured set of rules based off consensus. In that sense the mod is just enforcing what is agreed upon standards. Not their opinion/bias of every single answer.

Perhaps make it so you must submit an answer before you can join the discussion. An opening statement if you will.

Earthbound_Misfit's avatar

I like the concept too. I think it would be great. Although, you would get more repetition I’d guess. Not everyone reads the previous questions so you get repetition with Fluther but I think people do try to avoid writing the same answer as someone else. So you might end up with a long list of very similar answers because people wouldn’t delve more deeply into the topic in an effort to keep adding to the discussion.

Buttonstc's avatar

Most likely not.

Mimishu1995's avatar

No, I don’t think so. Firstly, like @Earthbound_Misfit said, repetition. I don’t think the OP of the question will be pleased with so many duplicate answers. Secondly, there are some questions that I absolutely have no answer and would like to read the answers to learn something. If I’m unable to read the answers, what should I do? Write something like “I don’t know too”?

Darth_Algar's avatar

Sounds dull to me. Not something I’d participate in.

johnpowell's avatar

When users contribute content to a site that owners slap ads around and there is a delay in seeing their contribution it is pretty much going to end badly. And AI to figure out if it is a good answer is pretty much dead for obvious reasons unless you are IBM and have Watson in your closet.

Lightlyseared's avatar

No. Most of the questions asked on q&a sites have no definitive answer (let’s face it if they did you’d be googling it instead). The most interesting questions on flutter are those where there is a discussion in the answers where new info is added or other answers are disputed for example. Thats why people come here.

ibstubro's avatar

Yes, “opening statement” was what I had in mind, @LDRSHIP. Once you had given an answer or made a statement the discussion would be exactly as it is now.

I did struggle with the ‘substantive’ thing, as I think is obvious in my wording of the question.

I think answer/comment repetition would simply mean there is a consensus, and the community had answered.

Dr_Lawrence's avatar

I would participate in such a site. I don’t answer every question except where I feel I can contribute something unique.

SimpatichnayaZhopa's avatar

Yes, I would. I do it anyhow on Fluther most of the time. I have done it on other Q&A websites as well. I do not have time to read all answers to questions.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther