@Dutchess_III You said your morality comes from God. Ergo, if there were no God you would have no morals.
Well, morality would not exist, so neither would anyone else. However, there would be some standard in place.
@jwalsh1202.I would say yes, especially with religious based morals.
You say that to say only people whose morality comes from religion override logic with morality and those who have morality they credit to be of anything but religion always place the logic ahead of said morality? As far as the question goes, what you said is a little nebulous and unclear.
[…using gods name in vain (try harder @cazzie, Sky Father does not count!)
If she had directed it to a god, then it would make perfect sense, but since she was maligning God, a mocking disrespect like that does count, I pray she doesn’t have to explain it to Him in the last days.
The morals that are rational and logical appear to be fairly universal across many cultures and faiths, so I would say they are independent of religion.
There are times where morality and compassion, etc. can be logical, other times it doesn’t. If morality is logical it might be because people force it to be because they do not want logic to make them appear illogical. How or which logic mankind uses is immaterial, the pertinent fact is does that morality ever take front stage in front of logic?,
@SmashTheState If one accepts natural law (and why wouldn’t one?), then logic and morality are completely synonymous.
They are not, to believe that is a folie à deux, and I am not part of it. If any system exists in nature it is logic, unadulterated by compassion, Eros, arrogance, greed etc. It is mainly about survival, survival, and more survival.
The moral imperative is a special case of the categorical imperative – both the perfect and imperfect duty of the first formulation.
An interesting piece of reading but has no footing or supplies no ammo for this question.
@cazzie your offense at the Sky Father comment tells me something of your morals vs your logic.
If you have not figured my morality and logic by now, you have not been taking notes, I have stated them more times than one can shake a stick at them. Certainly nothing negative…..
Now, that might sound like a logical solution, but we don’t do that. That, by definition, is quite insane.
Well, we finally came up with something we can launch from, and it took all this.That may or may not be logical, but cheating the insurance company is certainly not moral. Even if he was terminally ill, his morality to be honest and upright to death would not allow him to be a crook and cheat the insurance company even if it helps his family. It is like during the Great Depression, when I heard stories of a hungry kid stealing bread; he was hungry and the bread was on the stand by the street easy to get, with no money it made logical sense to swipe the bread. However, once his father found out, he marched the lad back to the store and made him giver the bread back, and apologize to the baker. With a family hungry and a loaf of bread in the house, logic says take care of your own 1st over the moral imperative to be honest and not a crook. Some people in spite they needed the bread, widget, or whatever, can’t live with themselves being a thief, even if they are the only one who would know they are a thief. Insanity did not keep him from doing the logical thing in that situation. It might not be logical if the father worked at that bakery part time, then the theft would jeopardize work which equals money.