How does not voting change the system you dislike? How does not voting improve the political picture in the U.S. in any way?
That’s sort of like saying, “I don’t believe in cars so I can walk where I want to,” stepping out in the street and getting run over.
Not only that, but you guarantee by not voting that the people you call evil will be free to do whatever they want.
Are you sure that you have carefully examined the platforms of the two candidates, and you see no difference between them? There is not a single issue such as health care, the environment, alternative energy, civil rights that impacts your life that the two candidates’ administrations would handle differently if elected? Because when you elect a President, you elect a cabinet, a chief of staff, all the people that run the huge business that is federal government trickling down through directives to the Civil Service.
In the case of government, the devil is in the details. Just as the Clinton Administration had significantly different policies at that level than the Bush Administration does, so too would an Obama Administration be significantly different than a McCain Administration.
I know that how the Justice Department, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration, just to name three of many examples, conducts their business can have a huge impact on people’s lives in the next four years. I care what that impact is.
That is why I am voting. Does either candidate represent my feelings perfectly or even to a large extent? No, but I have a clear preference when I look at the policy level.
I know that if I vote a certain way and my candidate is elected, I have contributed to the likelihood that the U.S. will not launch any new military initiatives in the next four years. That matters to me. I am happy to take that one step forward. I feel lucky that now I have that chance to change the course, even it is just the smallest bit, toward a better world.