What is the other side of the following legal case?

Here

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/omar-khadr-free-on-bail-vows-to-prove-he-is-a-good-person-1.3065692
One side says:
1)He was not doing anything to innocent people only engaging soldiers in a war, so he can’t be a terrorist.
2)As well, he had no choice, he was 15, he was a child soldier, his family forced him into it.
3) He has already spent 13 years
What does the other side say about it, (other than “we’re the side of the victims”) to counter the above points
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/omar-khadr-freed-bail-while-155957727.html