@Pandora I actually understand a person still loving their dog. A dog doesn’t understand morality or really understand right from wrong. So how can you fault it.
Still, is love to be linked with morality and take the lead position? A person may know the difference between lawful, not lawful, right from wrong, but because they don’t act on the wrong they should be loved but if they act on the wrong knowing it is wrong, then they should be hated? It still comes back to what right and wrong one views, and if the action is the person. Women marry mobsters knowing what they do, for all the compassion, love, etc. mobsters can show to those they like and love, they can be bloody ruthless to those who cross them.
But a grown person. Yes. And what you realize when the person turns out to be a monster is that you never really knew that person. You loved the person you were fooled into loving.
Women who got together with mobster and gangstas often know what activity their man did, and in some, that is the draw. In many cases the other person doesn’t fall into your definition as the monster, they may develop a taste for shooting dogs, or other wild life, or setting huge fires, who a person was at 20 could change at 45, it doesn’t mean they were fooling anyone at age 20 it was just a shift in attitude or emotion for whatever reason.
Love doesn’t materialize out of thin air.
A lot of people do just that (or they think they do), just for a very narrow band of people.
We each should present our true selves to each other or you endanger the love you create.
That is the process called courtship, which a lot of people basically bypass or clip so short as to not be effective in any usable way to know who you are with. No one is going to come out the gate and put all the junk from their closet on display as to be that transparent. They are not going to say, ”Oh, by the way while I am flipping through channels on the commercial break I sometimes break wind in a very smelly manner, just letting you know to expect that when we are viewing the tube together” I believe transparency comes but it takes years, many don’t wait that long, do they?
We all change along the way but no one changes into a monster. They always were a monster and always will be.
Well, that is subject to debate. Maybe one day science will determine that, if science does I hope society can live with the consequence of it. Brings to mind the ”Minority Report”, the thought that everyone who ends up in jail was going to end up there anyhow and if you can figure out who before they get there you can remove them from society because they are criminals lying dormant until something activates them.
Being a murderer or pedophile is a long way from someone who is a shop lifter for example. Or even someone who murdered someone to protect someones life or their own.
That again, depends on where one draws their line.
So can you truly love someone who never showed who they really are?
Unless I can get into someone’s head I will never know them completely. I hope I take the time for them to reveal who they are by work and deed more than lip service, but should I develop a love for them, then I do, I may hate something they did or do, but that doesn’t automatically cancel out the love and turn on the hate.
@Aster You’d have to define, “fake love.”
It might be different for many, but the best way I can define it is a shallow conditional love, predicated on what the giver gets back. If they person feels they are getting equal love back, they stay in love with the other, but if it feels one-sided, then they don’t. True love is that you love the other person if they never return the love and no matter what action they do, you can hate the act but still love the person. In short, a love one is in because they love the feeling of being in love, so if it is directed toward another it is actually to make them feel better first.