Social Question

ragingloli's avatar

Moral Dilemma: What would you choose?

Asked by ragingloli (52231points) May 31st, 2015

The following situation is at hand:
The local baron has contracted you to find his escaped wife.
During your search, you come across a small group of houses in the swamps, ruled by a trio of witches, where you not only find the baron’s wife, but also a group of orphaned children, which the witches intend to eat later.
In exchange for information important to you, the witches ask you to slay a spirit that has possessed a nearby tree, which has caused a number of deaths from a nearby village.
After talking to the possessed tree, it asks you to free it, instead of killing it. In exchange for its freedom, it promises to free the children imprisoned by the witches.

These are your choices:
1. Free the spirit.
If you do this, the children will indeed be rescued, however, the spirit now slaughters almost all the inhabitants of the nearby village.
Furthermore, when you and the baron go back to the swamps to retrieve his wife, you find her turned into a monster, and she soon dies. In response to this, the baron hangs himself at his castle.

2. You slay the spirit.
If you do this, the inhabitants of the village will not be killed.
However, when you return to the swamps with the baron, you find that the witches have eaten the children.
The baron’s wife is not turned into a monster, but suffers from extreme dementia. The Baron does not commit suicide, and instead promises to take his wife to a faraway sage.

Which do you choose? (I chose the latter.)

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

24 Answers

ucme's avatar

I choose scenario #1, but not before I fuck his wife into the middle of next week.

ragingloli's avatar

@ucme
She is at least 50.

Mimishu1995's avatar

The latter. At least more people would be saved.

Bill1939's avatar

I would choose #2 because many children will not be born if the villagers die. The outcomes of the Baron and his wife are immaterial. However, if I could I would make a third choice. I would kill the witches and the spirit, thus saving the children now and in the future.

ucme's avatar

@ragingloli But her pussy is as tight as a vice…paper bag on head.

josie's avatar

Under the circumstances you describe, I would probably flip a coin.

Pandora's avatar

If I had to choose than I would choose number 2 but make the witches promise to release the children and return the baroness unharmed and in good health.

RadioFlyer's avatar

I just returned after an 18-month hiatus from this site. During that time, I didn’t miss many people on here but, @ragingloli, I will confess to kind of missing you….

Apparently_Im_The_Grumpy_One's avatar

option 3— kill the filthy cannibal witch, make a nice rocking chair out of the evil spirit tree

whitenoise's avatar

You arrive at the tree after you have entered into two agreements: 1) save the wife, 2) kill the spirit in the tree.

Now breaking two agreements to save three children and have a whole village killed doesn’t seem to be the right thing to do.

Even if the village wouldn’t be wiped out… You took the task upon you to slay the spirit.

Why one would do that in the first place is beyond me…

Can I have some of what you’re smoking?

Berserker's avatar

Slay the spirit. I just want loot and rewards. Screw those little kids. :D

ragingloli's avatar

Also, killing the witches is not an option, because they are far too powerful for you to take on. You would be killed instantly.

zenvelo's avatar

#1 – save the children! The Villagers are paying the price for their keeping the orphans from escaping the clutches of the witches. And the widow is lost to the baron either way.

sahID's avatar

I would choose #1. The children would be saved, frustrating the witches, and the Baron would get everything he deserves. One possible downside to this solution could be the witches assuaging their frustration by bringing something nasty crashing down on your head at a later date.

talljasperman's avatar

I would mind my own business and go home. Then get a real job. It is only a delema if you give a dam.

Coloma's avatar

The 2nd scenario, IF the lives saved in the village are more numerous than the lives of the children.
The greater good would be in the total number of lives saved, a few vs. many.

This is starting to sound like a potential recap of my death penalty sentiments. Oh oh. lol

Blondesjon's avatar

I would tell the Baron that the outcome of either scenario really does nothing for his wife and wash my hands of the whole fucking mess.

whitenoise's avatar

@talljasperman
I guess the only way it could be a delemma is if you don’t give a damn.
That is, if anything can be a delemma to begin with.

(A delemma indicating the situation you’re in after rejecting all propositions. It could be a verb actually, akin to defuse. I’d delemma the situation and go for neither option.)

Apparently_Im_The_Grumpy_One's avatar

Lurve for a really stupid fucking question.

ragingloli's avatar

You know what the worst thing is? being rejected by a succubus because I smell too much of blood.

talljasperman's avatar

Succubus should date incubus then everyone is happy.

Berserker's avatar

@ragingloli Well maybe you should stop fucking killing everything.

ragingloli's avatar

Starving villagers pay good money to get rid of monsters.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther