Making yourself do something, or stopping yourself from acting a certain way - which is easier?
Asked by
longgone (
19717)
June 26th, 2015
For me, it is definitely the latter. I can talk myself out of nasty responses when angry, for the most part. I can stop myself from buying unnecessary chocolate bars or frantically tapping at the keyboard when my computer is acting up.
It would seem that I have a lot of self-discipline.
However…what I can’t do is talk myself into good decisions. I can’t get myself to clean my house or get some exercise unless I feel motivated to do so, for example. Luckily, I do feel motivated to do both regularly.
What about you?
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
6 Answers
Depends on my mood. I have self discipline, but I also have a temper. Sometimes I walk away from the angry responses, sometimes not. I don’t have a problem with talking myself into doing good things, It’s not that hard.
They’re about the same.
I can make myself not drink but I can’t stop myself from not drinking.
The former. I’m advanturous, so it’s harder to repress the urge to do something.
I find habit modification much more challenging that just making myself do something, usually.
I’m not sure. As others have said it depends on the thing I’m either trying to make myself do or prevent myself from doing. Is the thing I’m trying to stop an addition? Then it will be harder to stop because there are probably physiological as well as psychological elements influencing my behaviour.
As to making myself do things, I can find it very hard to force myself to do some things. Yet if I can develop a habit, the thing isn’t hard to do at all.
The answer is all in the detail. I’ve been trying to make myself write for the last couple of hours and I still haven’t got going!
Those are really the same in my opinion. Both require you to go against your natural flow to produce desired results.
Answer this question