@canidmajor You know, this reminds me of a situation which occured a few years ago when I was organizing the Ottawa Panhandlers’ Union. We’d won a lawsuit and had a bunch of money, and wanted to open our own storefront. There was an anarchist infoshop which had run out of money and were going to have to close. We, the OPU, thought it would be good for everyone concerned for us to work together; we could bankroll the space, they would provide the volunteers to staff the place, and we could share the space to everyone’s benefit.
The problems started when the infoshop informed me every member of the OPU would be required to sign a safe space and anti-oppression statement which said, more or less, that we agree to examine our privilege and work on eliminating the benefits we derive therefrom. Now, on the surface this looks fine. From the perspective of a white, middle-class college radical. But see, these white, middle-class college radicals are telling a bunch of mostly homeless, substance-addicted beggars with mental health issues that they must examine their privilege. One of our members was a homeless, native, openly transgender, meth-addicted, HIV-positive sex trade worker. How much privilege do you think she has? I tried to explain to the infoshop people how our people were likely to react to being told to ”check their privilege” by a bunch of middle-class leftists, and all I got was cold stares.
As I predicted, our people did not react well. There was quite a bit of ”what the fuck“ing and such from people who were not au fait with the niceties of feminist theory and campus identity politics. In the end, the infoshop chose not to exist at all rather than partner with us.
@DoNotKnow I’m not surprised that a woman might react that way. But I am annoyed. Creating a culture based on weakness and victimization is everything which is wrong with leftist politics. Peace is not and has never been maintained by weakness. It is maintained by strength. If women are being systematically raped and murdered, the solution is not to make all women paranoid and suspicious of men; the solution is to arm every woman sufficiently to make them unafraid to talk to a stranger on the street.
This is far from the first time this particular conflict has had a negative effect on my life and the lives of people I care about. As an organizer working with the street, I find myself in constant conflict with women and women’s groups who want cameras and floodlights everywhere. In Ottawa, for example, several city parks had cameras, floodlights, and speakers installed, monitored 24/7. If they saw someone who looked homeless, they would activate the speakers and say, “Leave the park now. Police have been called.” Because, you see, we’re the scary stranger danger that these nice middle class women don’t want to have in their parks. Our existence is a threat to them because we have tattoos and bad teeth and beards and don’t wear suits and ties.
I understand that women do get raped and assaulted and murdered, and that shouldn’t happen. But I also refuse to get into a victimization auction where I have to prove that my victimization is worse than your victimization. I’ve spent my entire life refusing to be a victim and teaching others how not to be victims either. Contrary to popular belief, you do not have the right to not feel threatened. You have the right not to be harmed. How you feel is a matter of supreme indifference to me. If you happen to find the sight of poor people – or blacks, or homosexuals, or Jews – threatening, then feel free to wear a blindfold. You don’t get to make my existence anathema because you don’t want to see me.