Are opposition to war and supporting of troops mutually exclusive positions?

Nope, they are not. I am opposed to war in almost all instances outside a demonstrated need to defend against an attack. But that does not mean I am opposed to supporting those who are prepared to defend us.

And, it seems that those in Congress that do not support wars are those willing to make sure that veterans are cared for after they serve.

And the most jingoistic voices are the ones who consider our servicemen as little more than cannon fodder and window dressing for campaign pictures.

I have to think there is significant overlap between the groups. Nobody should be more opposed to war than the soldiers who will be fighting in it. People supporting the troops should also not want our warriors to go and fight unnecessarily. But if it becomes necessary, I feel people should all support our men for better or worse so that they may return undamaged. Which is why I oppose many rules of engagement rather than oppose war. Politicians make wars drag on.

Very good points @majorrich.

I will admit to having mixed feelings on this topic. I oppose war in general, particularly wars that I see as “for profit” or to protect and promote corporate interests and I scorn those who promote a policy of “my country right or wrong”. Perhaps it stems from, as you mentioned, ” not want our warriors to go and fight unnecessarily” and what I consider necessary is not what the vast majority of our political elite consider necessary.

My feelings can be summed up by noting that those who have the most to gain from war should be the ones on the front line. If it is so goddam important, then lead me into it BUT if I can’t see your ass then you are not leading me. Don’t expect me to do your dirty work for you.