Basically, what @DrasticDreamer said.
I know people from Morocco, who also happen, like most Moroccans, to be sunni muslims. They don’t care or empathise with people from arabic (different ethnicity) extremist (as opposed to more moderate Morocco) countries who have earned the scorn and animosity of most of the west.
That said, my two cents on the issue:
While guilt by association is not a good thing, there is something to say about community diplomatic capital. A government has the responsibility to cultivate good diplomatic relationships for the sake of their people, otherwise their people will pay the price. This is a war we’re talking about. There’s always casualties. That’s why the more civilised countries try to avoid it.
If you go around pissing the bigger countries off, you’re gonna get your people killed. It’s unfortunate, it’s unpleasant, but that’s war.
And on that note, Daesh didn’t piss off just anybody. They pissed off France and Russia. They attacked the two countires that won and fought most wars Europe has ever been in. They are a bug that will get a lot of innocents killed because they don’t care about that.
Sad? Sure. Can we do anything else? Not really. There is such a thing as people who only understand the language of violence, and Daesh clearly qualifies.
What is insane is that in what any sane person would define a time of war we have literally opened the borders to refugees FROM the opposing side. Like if the Germans opened the door to French refugees during the blitzkrieg. Then we wonder why attacks like Paris happen.
Meanwhile, during WW2, american citizens of Japanese descent were put into camps because they were deemed as security risk because of their ties to the enemy. Inhumane? Sure. War always is. But it was the smarter thing to do.
And before anyone thinks to jump down my throat: No, not all refugees are terrorists. But some are, and they are using the others to come in undetected. Does this mean they’re all guilty? No. Does it mean they are a liability? Fuck yes.