Social Question

ibstubro's avatar

Why do some people seem to feel a need to touch everything in order to shop?

Asked by ibstubro (18804points) January 3rd, 2016

I see this all the time in re-sale shops.
Instead of just looking at the items on a shelf, some people go along and pick each item up? Why?
Are they just killing more time, or do some people have a need for additional sensory input?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

27 Answers

SQUEEKY2's avatar

Some are just touchy feely types, I tend to pick up and look (inspect) just the items I might be interested in, but I have seen what you are saying and some people just have to touch freakin everything for some reason, weather they are interested in the item or not.

ibstubro's avatar

It’s amazing to watch, if you’re not in a hurry, @SQUEEKY2. The randomness. Seems like they rarely, rarely buy anything.
If you’re in a hurry and behind them, it’s maddening!

ragingloli's avatar

To judge surface properties, sturdiness and mass, which are all indicators of quality or the lack thereof.
It is really just obvious common sense.

stanleybmanly's avatar

There is this inborn instinct to “inspect” with your hands, and anyone unaware of this will pay a heavy price if their space is invaded by a toddler.

ragingloli's avatar

Donald Gennaro: [Tim pops up wearing a pair of night vision goggles] Hey, where’d you find that?
Tim: In a box under my seat.
Donald Gennaro: Are they heavy?
Tim: Yeah.
Donald Gennaro: Then they’re expensive, put ‘em back

SQUEEKY2's avatar

@ragingloli sure in the items you might be interested in , but to do it to everything??

ragingloli's avatar

@SQUEEKY2
Mayhaps they do not know yet if they are interested in it, and have to evaluate it properly to make that decision?

ragingloli's avatar

Or perhaps they are just curious and need to have a closer examination.
I do not see anything wrong with that, whatsoever.

msh's avatar

For the same reason people walk up to a glass showcase and proceed to leave prints all over it-pointing at things, leaning on it, resting their hands, palms, etc. Junior licking the front. -Yes, and more often than you want to know. Then because they are selling the $ items under special lights, and every mark shows, you spend a great deal of time cleaning them.

Buying produce is another touchy-feely forum.

stanleybmanly's avatar

I know that it takes restraint on my part to avoid handling things. And as you state, the greater my interest in the object, the more likely that it will be graced with my fingerprints.

Coloma's avatar

I don’t have to touch things but I do have a propensity for wanting to touch strangers that are wearing cool clothing that has texture. haha I also have to touch, feel, blankets, bedding, pillows etc.
“Oooh, do you mind if I fondle your scarf for a moment?”
I’m a sensual, squeeze the Charmin, type.lol

ibstubro's avatar

When not in a hurry, I’ve stood to the side and watched people touch nearly everything on the shelf in a resale shop.
Tupperware bowl with no lid
Glass baking dish
Votive candle that’s been burned
Cook pot
Ice cream scoop
Flower pot
Wooden measure
Randomly touching everything, almost like a blind person would. Buying nothing.

@stanleybmanly might have something there with making it through the toddler stage.

Yes, @SQUEEKY2, exactly. “But to do it to everything?

Ah. @msh has worked retail!
Produce I understand better…but only every example of the veggie I’m interested in buying! lol

Oh, I pick plenty of stuff up, @stanleybmanly. Things I’m interested inand things I’m unfamiliar with. Just not everything, randomly.

Oh, @Coloma, hunny. I bought a Microlight to Sherpa KING blanket today for $20. It just begs to be petted. lol

Coloma's avatar

@ibstubro Haha..I have one of those too…bliss out to the 10th power.

ibstubro's avatar

I’m thinking about going pseudo cave man and replacing the top sheet with the king sherpa blanket, @Coloma. I’ll never wanna get out of bed! It’s freakin 20° here tonight.

JLeslie's avatar

Touching an item helps you decipher the quality of something. How heavy it is, how it feels, how thick it is.

@msh I completely disagree. I like to touch and feel things when I go shopping, it’s why I prefer going to a store, rather than shop online, but I never touch the windows, or leave prints on the cases that hold merchandise.

I worked retail for years and most people don’t leave their prints all over the glass, but they do pick up and touch goods for sale constantly.

dxs's avatar

This reminds me of when I was little and food shopping with my mom. It’d always fascinate me to poke the packages of ground beef.

msh's avatar

@JLeslie, we have a similar experience in employment, just different departments. I worked in the wonderful world of non-comissioned fine jewlery. While beautiful, my items were placed inside of locked cases. Thus the licking and drooling of many on top of the cases were a continuing chore of the erasure of fingerprints – so many as to rival AFIS! Yow!

Coloma's avatar

@ibstubro Hah…I’ve been doing that for years now, no top sheet in winter, only the super soft blankie then the electric and then the top comforter. Try it, it’s heavenly.

rojo's avatar

I only touch the soft, fuzzy stuff…. and the leather.

JLeslie's avatar

@msh I worked in jewelry a short time, and yes, we had to wipe off finger prints through the day. Never drool though? Gross.

Jewelry compared to other departments is nothing. It’s not heavy and back breaking. Go schlep clothing or linens all day long, fold the same sweater or pair of jeans 20 times in a day. Move men’s suits around (heavy) or clean out a juniors department dressing room.

Stinley's avatar

We use information from our senses differently. I’m a touchy feely type and will do exactly as you describe. I want to know how it feels as much as I want to know what it looks like. I would guess you would hesitate to buy something you hadn’t seen. I would also hesitate to buy something I hadn’t touched. You have looked at all the things in the shop and that’s fine. I look and feel all the things.

AdventureElephants's avatar

I grope produce pretty heavily before I pick the perfect one. I also pick up every package of meat and look at them all before deciding.

Other than that I’m pretty hands off. I’m too obsessive to ever think to touch glass. The fingerprints would consume my thoughts and I would leave empty-handed.

ibstubro's avatar

I hope, @rojo, that your not just touching the soft, fuzzy and leather wearing people, like @Coloma.

I have a feeling you you appear more discerning when you shop, @Stinley, and less maniacal than the people I see. You don’t have to touch every single unrelated item on a shelf, do you?

Well, of course you have to look at every package of meat, @AdventureElephants, until you get to the back and then you either/or your way back to the front. Produce I can usually pick from 3–4.
I never touch display cabinets. Once in a while I catch myself pressing on the glass of a door when leaving a store and cringe.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

I don’t know, but I used to do that a lot. I give a pass to people who handle fruit in the grocery stores. I understand that. A lot can be determined by giving a peach or a plumb a slight squeeze, or a melon a knock with the knuckles. Every good cook knows that. Smell is important, too, as this requires one to place the fruit or vegetable dangerously close to the nasal sinuses, which can be considered abhorrent to some northern European and north American cultures. But packaged goods? I used to do that. I think it comes from when I was a kid. Holding a toy and looking at it from all angles fired the imagination.

As an adult, I did the same. I used to touch famous paintings in museums in Europe. Bad, I know. I set off a few alarms. But I did it so that I could say I did it—I ran my fingers across the brushstrokes of a Monet or Renoir; or the wild, fiery, manic knife-strokes of Van Gogh, thick with passion. He literally laid it on with a trowel. Used to drive my wife nuts. She stopped going with me. When I came back to the states, we didn’t go to museums for awhile. Orlando has Mickey Mouse, people don’t go there to see a Vermeer, for the powerful mouse leaves no vacuum for other culture. Anyway, I got out of the habit. Nevertheless, I still might touch a sculpture now and then well aware that the oils on my hand may slightly discolor the marble. But security is a lot more efficient nowadays and American guards aren’t known for slaps on the wrist.

But to run my fingers along the back of the thigh just under the gluteal fold of Apollonie Sabatier’sFemme+piqu%C3%A9e+par+un+serpent%2C&oq=Femme+piqu%C3%A9e+par+un+serpent%2C&gs_l=img.3..0i19j0i30i19l2.8971.8971.0.10201.1.1.0.0.0.0.131.131.0j1.1.0….0…1.2.64.img..0.1.131.X92uiI8ujdk ample derriere in the Musee d’Orsay is a memory that I cherish. She had a salon in Paris that, along with her beauty and intellect, attracted the brightest artists, writers, musicians and composers, actors, directors and stage designers in Europe. She was Baudelaire’s number one Fluer du Mal and he threatened suicide because she wouldn’t make love to him. He had the sympathy of his cohorts. Clésinger, in love with her like all the others, sculpted her reclining on his couch, life-size, and obviously writhing in the throes of orgasm. And he took his bloody time about it. He left nothing out, right down to lovingly sculpting the small amount of cellulite at the back of her upper thighs.

Afraid that his work was too pornographic for the annual showing at Salon de Paris, he attempted to disguise his subject’s condition by calling the work, Femme piquée par un serpent, (Woman Bitten by a Serpent), a reference to Eve in the Garden (and the highest honor to Sabatier; proclaiming her the prototypical woman, the perfect one that all others were made from—right down to the cellulite. Yes, we get the joke, Monsieur Clésinger. I think we all know what snake you’re referring to.

The Salon of 1847 refused to accept Clésinger’s opus, not because of the writhing, per sé. But because of the celulite. The argument was that, although the Salon tolerated nudes of Goddesses and allegorical Biblical figures in the past, this was by no means a Goddess. Goddesses did not have celulite and therefore the sculpture was pornographic—a three-dimensional depiction of a lowly mortal, and mortals could not be shown in the nude. It took a two-year trial to settle that. And another to years for Clésinger to win on appeal. I ran my fingers over those small indentations at the back of Mlle Sabatier’s thigh that got Clésinger in so much trouble because I liked the story, I liked what had been written about her, and I liked the numerous famous paintings she had posed for. I might confess to being a bit in love with her myself.

It’s a weird fetish, I know. But where I live now, there are no museums. There are too many priorities that need addressing, before one can afford to stock an art museum of famous works. So, the museums can rest easy, they are safe from my exploring fingers. But I understand the need to touch the things one desires. It brings yet one more sense into play and thus makes the experience just a bit more real. For just one moment in time—moment that can become a memory cherished for years afterward, you possess that one beautiful, otherwise unattainable thing.

ibstubro's avatar

GA simply for the poetry of your response, @Espiritus_Corvus.

Stinley's avatar

@Espiritus_Corvus Have you read the Goldfinch by Donna Tartt? It’s not about touching but is about the ownership of a work of art. Big old book though…

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther