@Buttonstc Funny that I have said before that I’m not keen on black history month or teaching black history in schools, because I feel it is all just part of history. We can learn about famous people in history who are black all year long. Separating out a month or a special chapter in a text book seemed odd to me and promoting the idea of separation into the future. History is usually taught chronologically, and that should be sufficient in my mind.
But, then I think of producing a movie or writing a book about the Tuskegee black airmen, and I just can’t deny them the acknowledgment that they were black, during a racist time, and made amazing accomplishments for our military and country, and to give credit to the people in our government and military who supported their recruitment and service. To strip them of their “race” in that situation is difficult for me.
However, all stories about history, struggle, pioneering, invention; we certainly can look at people as simply people. Be colorblind, religion blind, ethnicity blind, and just hear or see the story.
I’m not sure where I stand in the end. I asked the question, because I’m not sure.
I think some people make it about giving actors a fair shot at work, but I don’t care about that I don’t think when it comes to history. For fiction, whether it be dramas, comedy, mysteries, I think we should almost never limit ourselves to race for a character. Maybe there is one or two exceptions. For times in history where race is a central issue, I find it harder.
Although, look at To Kill a Mockingbird. Could the black man accused of rape have been Jewish, and the story is the same? Or, Hispanic, Indian, Chinese? What about just another “white” man?