Social Question

NerdyKeith's avatar

(NSFW) Why are some people not interested in a monogamous relationship?

Asked by NerdyKeith (5489points) March 21st, 2016

I know it can be exciting for some playing the field (if you will). But how long can that excitement really last? Personally if I was to just to have casual sexual encounters; quite frankly I would get very lonely very quickly. I would find it meaningless and empty.

In my opinion, when sex is used as an expression of love within a relationship; it in my view enhances the experience.

So I guess I’m trying to understand why someone would not want a relationship.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

22 Answers

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

My years of experimentation and testing of all things were from the time I left my parents home until I married at age 30, a twelve years adventure. Until that time, I had a lot to learn and discover. One of the things I learned was that I prefered monogamous relationships over all the many other options available. I think everyone needs to experiment and most do, but many also don’t require experiencial evidence for every little thing in life. They read in a book why one shouldn’t put their hand into the flame and be satisfied with that information. I was of the type that needed to stick his whole arm in. Every time.

ARE_you_kidding_me's avatar

I greatly prefer being monogomous but it comes with a high cost that many don’t want to pay. You have someone else to answer to and most things end up being a compromise. It’s no secret that my life and living arrangement would be different if I had nobody to answer to. That comes at a high cost also loneliness.

marinelife's avatar

I think that what defines a good monogamous relationship is intimacy. I don’t think moving from partner to partner or having multiple partners at once lends itself to truly intimate relationships (but then I think that is why some people choose those lifestyles).

Dutchess_III's avatar

Actually, I think that most people are interested in a monogamous relationship. They love the idea of being able to come home to that one person, and knowing that that one person will be there for them.
However, sometimes they want to have their cake and eat it too. The want that one, dependable person around, but they still want to play the field.

josie's avatar

See @Dutchess_III

Monogamy and straying seem to be elements of human nature. Probably will never have one without the other.

Dutchess_III's avatar

Well, in nature monogamy is the exception rather than the rule.
In humans, The females desire monogamy more than the male, and even after making promises, the male is more likely to “stray” than the female.

Setting our social concepts of morality and faithfulness aside, It all makes perfect, biological sense if you think about it.

ARE_you_kidding_me's avatar

@Dutchess_III in theory men stray more but just who are they straying with then? Both sexes have major evolutionary advantages by cheating.

Dutchess_III's avatar

No, they don’t. Men can, theoretically, impregnate hundreds, if not thousands of women in their lives (Just ask Dr. J!) They can do so well into old age.

Women, on the other hand, can only get pregnant about once a year, and for a limited number of years. AND they’re left with the onus of keeping the offspring, and THEMSELVES, alive. Can you imagine have 15 or 20 kids, by 15 or 20 different men, and trying to keep them all in food and shelter by yourself? No…the children have a much better chance of living to adulthood with two caretakers.

The men, evolutionary speaking, are interested in quantity. Women are interested in quality.

ARE_you_kidding_me's avatar

Women are interested in resources for themselves and their children regardless if the male provider was“breeding stock”
The result is that they’ll cheat with the more suitable males but settle with the ones who have the best living situation. That likely was an older male looking to trade up for a younger and more fertile female. It takes two to cheat and it’s absurd to think that it is not a two sided phenomenon. That’s just one example there are likely many more reasons men and women both cheat

ucme's avatar

Because people are different, thank fuck.

janbb's avatar

People can be looking for one or the other thing at different times in their lives as their needs for autonomy/dependence vary.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

Researchers have suspected since the Kinsey Report of the 1950’s that men and women are equally libidinous, but women didn’t practice infidelity due to their economic dependence on men. The latest studies have shown that infidelity in general has risen drastically in teh past twenty years and this is attributed to the ability of both sexes to connect emotionally via the internet privately. the infidelity gender gap is rapidly closing as well and this is attributed to women having more economic independence. It appears that women behave just like men in this respect as soon as they come into their own.

Google Result for infidelity gap, more women are unfaithful, university of indiana study

The sexes are expected to have parity within just a few more years.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

Back to your question, Keith. If it appears to you that there are an awful lot of people around you not interested in monogamy, it may be your age cohort, plus the few inevitable older, recalcitrant interlopers. I remember a time in my life when it appeared the monogamous were a dying breed. Key West in the 1970’s, for example. It’s a sunny little isle and at the time it was inhabited by quite a hearty, traditional fishing community.

Two openly gay authors, Tennessee Williams and Truman Capote, both famous and wealthy, independently but during the same period, colonized the town with their own separate retinues made up of sun-worshiping, body-building, youthful males from the New York City metropolitan area. They brought their friends and friends of friends and everyone brought good New York cash with them, bought and rented lodgings in this economically anemic community and thus softened the cultural shock experience by the traditional town locals.

The town became more festive over night, the tourist industry became year round and catered to a younger and more moneyed crowd, new businesses, new bars, whole new small industries opened up. Whereas a Friday night on Duval Street looked relatively sedate with some a few bars peopled by local fishermen and a few tourists in 1970, in 1973 there were wall-to-wall hordes of young men and women crowding the sidewalks going from bar to bar—whole streets of night clubs of every conceivable theme—clubs side by side radiating off Duvall onto every street in the business district.

Suddenly here was always something to celebrate, there were spontaneous street marches of heavily made-up, very tall ladies dressed from head to toe in the finest Las Vegas Showgirl regalia, rank and file, high-kicking it to disco music down the middle of downtown. Nobody cared that they had prominent Adam’s apples. There was always a festival, organized or not. Monogamy was anything that lasted for more than three weeks. Very unusual and the culprits involved were suspect of being crypto-establishment.

I was down there to find work as a diver, hopefully for Mel Fisher, but I would take anything. Once established, I found that I belonged to a minority of young heterosexual males. But I still couldn’t walk across Duvall Street without getting my butt pinched. But this was considered just another part of the Key West experience of that day. It was one of the many things that occur daily in a place that has decided to carve out it’s own brave new world, it’s own reality safely insulated by a body of water from all other realities. A place where the fire chief was the main source for weed and his firehouses his retail outlets, while he used the profits to build a modern Little League baseball field and team uniforms for the local kids. This is just one of many examples of how these wiley, practical locals adapted to the situation rather than resist the inevitable.

Anyway, I digress. Fast forward to 1995. A quiet town again. Wealthier, cleaner and prettier than the seedy boomtown of 1976 with it’s unique architectural heritage well preserved (something that was in doubt back when the town was hungry). The two writers were long dead but a lot of those crazy kids stayed in Key West, found a way to make a living, started small businesses and matured. The town matured. By the 1990’s they had taken a lot of the old Victorian homes and made them into first class, beautiful bed-and-breakfasts. They have the most unique shops one can find anywhere on earth. Always the tourist town, it now has established festivals celebrating their 1970’s past. It was one of the first towns in the U. S. to have a gay pride parade. They seceded from the Union when many of their radical ideas were threatened by an invasion of federal police in the 1970’s. Today it is an economic powerhouse in South Florida.

In 1995, I went down there and looked up some old friends from the crazy days. I found guys—the same guys who used to pinch my ass, cruise the bars, march in full regalia, were now presiding over B&Bs, antique stores, doing the interiors for hotel chains, writing books, creating art, members of the City Council—guys who, like me, were now greying at the temples, had soft bellies, lived in comfortable homes. There are still festivals, fewer and highly organised, but they are more inclusive, nationally promoted by a first class PR apparatus.

Most of these guys had found life partners and most of them were monogamous. War stories of the old days would elicit a quiet smile, maybe a knowing sparkle in the eye, but nothing more.

I think, for all the reasons in the posts above, this is what happens to most people. After you have had your fun, as you begin to realize your immortality and want to make the world a better place and realize there are rewards in stability far greater than that which you can get out in the field, you settle in with a like-minded partner. For some, the maturing process takes longer, but I think monogamy is as natural as an afternoon mango mojito on a shaded porch in laid-back Key West.

Sorry about the length. but I love writing about this place.

Dutchess_III's avatar

So easy to read @Espiritus_Corvus. No apologies necessary.

NerdyKeith's avatar

Yes no apology necessary @Espiritus_Corvus ; that was a very insightful answer. Very interesting to read. Thank you for sharing it.

badra100's avatar

The difference between men and women is not that great. There are many men and women who are faithful and many who are not.

Some will stray regardless, some will never stray, many stray only because they aren’t getting satisfied at home.

When you find that great guy and marry him just make sure you continue to keep him well f****d so he is not tempted to stray.

Dutchess_III's avatar

Oh, Jesus. What an ugly thing to say @badra100. I would hope there is more to a relationship than keeping one person well f*****, to the possible detriment of the person who is supposed to ensure that.

NerdyKeith's avatar

Any guy who expects to be “well fucked” within a relationship is too shallow for me to want to b with him.

Uberwench's avatar

I think the question is built on a false dilemma. We don’t have to pick between a long-term monogamous relationship and a series of casual encounters. Non-monogamy comes in many flavors. Plenty of people are “monogamish,” which means that they have one primary relationship that is mostly monogamous, but includes the occasional outside encounter. Threesomes and swinging parties are probably the most common, but some couples give one another permission once in a while to fuck a particularly tempting friend, coworker, or stranger. Some couples even think it’s hot to see or hear about their partner fucking somebody else (there are even whole fetishes based on this).

But being monogamish isn’t the only way to have both stability and non-monogamy. An open relationship might include a lot of outside dalliances. As long as those involved still put each other first, this can work out just great. Also, not all relationships involve only two people. For example, there could be a group of poly people who are in a closed triad (three people who all have sex with each other but never have sex with anyone outside the relationship). That’s not monogamy (because monogamy requires that the relationship be dyadic), but it’s still stable and long-term. I could go on and on, but the basic point is that there is a wide variety of ways to be non-monogamous. And you can have both a stable loving relationship and multiple sex partners at the same time.

It’s not for everyone. I’m not trying to say that it is or that there’s anything wrong with monogamy for those who like it. But monogamy isn’t for everyone, either. It’s definitely not for me. I’m a bisexual woman who prefers to have relationships with other women, but who definitely doesn’t want to give up fucking men (or other women when it gets right down to it). My current partner is a lesbian, so she’s not really interested in fucking men. But she is interested in fucking other women. So we’ve set the rules of our relationship in a way that lets us both get what we want within the boundaries of what the other is comfortable with. Setting rules that everyone in the relationship is comfortable with is the key. It also means the number of possible relationship models is nearly infinite.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther