It depends on what kind of leader is wanted or required.
For most of his life, Winston Churchill had “the qualities of a leader”, but for a good part of his political life he was an outsider, a back-bencher, unwanted. But when the time came… he was there, and ready to assume the mantle.
Same with Abraham Lincoln. He came from mean beginnings, taught himself law, lost more elections than most of us have even voted in, and then became – regardless of whether you think he was a “good” one or not, or how you feel about the rightness of the cause – the leader who more than any single person preserved the Union of the United States.
Aside from politics, though, leaders are where you find them, and what you want them to be. In my own organization, I’m “the leader” when it comes to Excel spreadsheets, data collections, technical references and search capability through our far-flung data collections and archives, and “the computer guy” for the group. (Sort of a glorified librarian – not that they don’t have their own glory.)
But when it comes to detailed, technical questions about boiler construction and commissioning, there are others in our group who I defer to. (As the Environmental Health and Safety guy, those questions are deferred to me. I’m also the de facto ASME reference guy.)
I’m also the best-looking one here, but we tend not to select leaders on that basis here, dammit. But I’m also the best writer (by default, since I’m pretty much the only one), so there’s that. Really, no one cares about that, either.