The OP should be reworded. Automotive crashworthyness is a very complex topic.
@ragingloli suggests a Formula 1 or Le Mans Prototype car. Yes, a carbon fiber safety cell is a very good way to survive a wreck but where are the turn signals? Why is the fat, surly woman at the DMV giving me such a hard time?
Don’t fret, there is hope. Porsche, McLaren Cars Limited, Pagani Automobili, Ferrari, and some others offer a car that will disintegrate down to it’s cell for ultimate occupant survivability.
Some cars, especially Mercedes’ S class will take total control to avoid a collision. Not my cup of tea but if it will keep those reading the style section from hitting me I’m all for it.
SUV safety is a total myth. When you consider all involved in a motor crash (not just the occupants of the low tech vault on wheels) one sees how these are an unnecessary hazard for all. You think you need an SUV, you don’t. You are fixated on image, And not one that impresses me one bit.
Don’t believe me? Even the makers of these lumberers refer to what they call “the lizard brain.” In other words THEY KNOW their product appeals to the self serving and unsophisticated part of one’s (cough) mind.
For this reason I believe that insurance rates should be based on the statistically based amount of damage your vehicle will do to all involved in the event of a crash. Oh darn, your Meximelt is mingling with your blood on the console.
OOH, your Escalade is SO HIGH.
Great. so when you T boned me at that intersection because you were switching from Jay Z to Li’l Wayne your bumper overrode my car’s door safety beams and decapitated my wife. You are such a STUD.
In the United States you can turn to www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings for a rather objective comparison of auto safety in an controlled environment.
In Europe? Look here www.euroncap.com/en