Do you believe that Ross Perot ever "peed in his pants" over something funny?
Asked by
ibstubro (
18804)
August 10th, 2016
The old coot is still alive, nearing 100.
He was the Anti-Trump.
A well-meaning billionaire that wanted to change the direction of the country.
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
7 Answers
At his age incontinence is pretty much as good as it gets.
I liked the old coot, and, he is only 86, not 100. haha
Deep in my pants, I know it to be true. Who hasn’t peed in their pants over something funny?
And what are you actually asking? I have no idea.
Why is Republican a tag on this question? Perot ran as an independant or libertarian, no?
I still find it hilarious that an adult male would refer to anything as “Pee in your pants funny!”
86 is closer than I want to get to 100.
Perot has identified himself as Republican since 2000. I wish he’d weigh in on the current presidential contest.
Perot ran under the “Reform Party”, they tried to register as the “Independent Party” but couldn’t for some reason. Maybe it would cause voter confusion?
He was the first politician I can remember that I actually listened to. Guy had some crazy ideas, but he tried to back it up with proof.
I peed my shorts on the “Tilt-a-Whirl” ride at the state fair in about 6th grade. My poor friend got the tilted pee all over her. haha
Oh I didn’t remember the pee joke.
I liked Ross Perot back when he ran for president, mainly because he was for dumping out a lot of the establishment and simplifying the tax code.
He had me calling myself a libertarian environmentalist for a while, before I heard of libertarians who want to abolish what regulations we have that protect the environment and the people from corporate exploitation. Since then, I’ve not heard of any libertarian who was willing to protect the planet from corporations, so I have had to avoid the label libertarian, even though I would like a simpler tax code, and the removal of many laws that mess with personal liberty but seem to serve little or no justified purpose. Corporations are clearly not people, nor do for-profit corporations have the good of people in mind, so I am for their regulation to protect everyone/everything else.
Answer this question