Really? So the smell of feces and the stench of rotten flesh are of equal quality to other scents like the smell of roses, or the fragrance smell of Chanel Allure?
Your analogy is a poor one. If I prefer the smell of roses, that means i find the stench of feces to be inferior. If you prefer the stench of feces, it doesn’t mean you’re inferior, it means your choice of scent is inferior (at least according to my subjectivity since i find the smell of roses to be superior which is why i prefer it to all the other scents)
Invalidity does not cancel out preferences. You can have an illogical, unfounded belief for your preference and it is still perceived to be of higher quality than anything else, whether done unjustly or not. You still find it to be superior quality in the end. That is why you prefer it over something else. If there is no hierarchy, if there is no discrimination to discern quality, then there no preference. There is no distinction in quality.
If I prefer white women over other ethnic women then I am indeed claiming an ethnic superiority. I am claiming that other ethnic women are aesthetically inferior to the white women that I prefer (subjectively). I am disgusted by the aesthetics of non-white women. Even within white women, I prefer women with medium to semi-large breasts, thicker hips, a symmetrical and proportional face and body. That means I consider someone who is too skinny, or too fat, with no symmetry or proportionality to be of inferior quality. If I perceived it as all of the same quality, I wouldn’t have a preference.
It works the same with intelligence, health, and culture. You’re not going to tell me retardation is of the same quality as a developed brain? Or high IQ and high degree of knowledge is equal to low IQ, and low degree of knowledge? Or that a sick person is of equal quality as a healthy person? Even if you made that claim. it wouldn’t matter because people still have a preference for one over the other for its perceived higher quality. It doesn’t matter what the reasons are. In the end it is seen as superior which is why it is prefered.
Interesting that you call my premise nonsense using a fallacy, but you don’t find that discourteous, yet you find it discourteous when I tell you that you don’t know what you’re talking about? You can be discourteous to others, but they can’t be discourteous to you? You just repeated another thoughtless accusation. If you make the claim that preference is not superiority, it needs to be proven with logical arguments. You have not done that. You used a fallacious argument to dismiss it. Thoughtless.