General Question

NerdyKeith's avatar

Is there any truth to people claiming that Hillary Clinton is responsible for the deaths of four people?

Asked by NerdyKeith (5489points) October 12th, 2016
Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

14 Answers

zenvelo's avatar

No. It is some kind of sick alt-right rumor to try and scare people.

stanleybmanly's avatar

No. But that isn’t the point. The point is that this sort of transparently stupid bullshit is made to drone incrssantly in the background of our lives for 25 years. It’s the fundamental page from the bible of subliminal advertising brilliantly realized by CocaCola. And it’s the primary reason that I don’t trust my gut reaction to Hillary Clinton. You shouldn’t trust yours either. Just for fun, try to count the number of Coke ads, billboards, posters, clocks, trays, jigsaw puzzles—just try to keep track of the number of times coke is pushed at your head in a typical day.

CWOTUS's avatar

Four? Oh, hell no. Some think the count is upwards of 40 by now. (This is for both Bill and Hillary; I don’t think anyone has attempted to differentiate or assign either of them as the “primary” reason.)

However, there have been a large number of Clinton associates – and particularly, recently, a number of them with (perhaps) stories to reveal or testimony to offer – who have turned up dead under sometimes mysterious circumstances.

MrGrimm888's avatar

To an extent, she’s probably responsible for way more. Not as an individual, but through her role in a government that kills many people, through many ways.

Zaku's avatar

It’s pretty hard to tell with all the disinformation (both positive spin and hate-fueled) and random stuff being written. And the lack, as far as I know, of any attempt to debunk or investigate the cases, except by amateurs. I think it’s entirely possible and even plausible, given the amount of corrupt money and power involved, and the way she seems to be a corporate pawn pretending to be a liberal/progressive.

SecondHandStoke's avatar

Clinton coverups most certainly do exist.

Bill denied his security compromising relationship with M. Lewinski to the bitter end. Only when it was determined that there was no other way out did President Clinton “admit” that the dangerous affair took place.

Many criticize the investigation for spending vast amounts of time and money to get to the truth. Bill could have saved nearly all of that by coming clean much, much earlier.

All of this was done over what some to consider a mere “affair.”

Imagine what these lawyers might do or say over deaths.

Pandora's avatar

@stanleybmanly , Wow, it’s not working on me then. I love their commercials but I’m a pepsi gal. Oh, wait! I saw what you did there. You deflected. You must be a politician.

@Zaku, I agree. There is also the lack of knowledge that Congress was asked to raise funds for embassy security and they denied it. So blame can go everywhere.
What I don’t get is why is this such a big deal. We’ve had people killed at Embassies before. It’s not the first time and it won’t be the last. People who work at Embassies know there is more risks at some than others. They can always deny taking a risky job, unless you join the military or CIA.

MrGrimm888's avatar

@SecondHandStoke .

What was ‘dangerous’ about Bill getting head?

filmfann's avatar

It’s a nonsense story embraced by Clinton-haters.

Zaku's avatar

Well the Benghazi embassy attack is one that did get investigated, by the Republicans, and turned up no evidence of wrongdoing, at least as far as I remember it was reported. I’m mainly wondering about the people who seem likely to have known inside dirt on her who have died – there are many reports of those, and as far as I know, there has been no serious investigation or even credible reporting about them. All in all there have been so many Clinton haters and so much noise pro and con that I find it hard to trust any information unless it has believable data, which seems to be very very rare.

MrGrimm888's avatar

^Yes. Lots of conjecture.

SecondHandStoke's avatar

@MrGrimm888

President Clinton put himself into a position that could have caused him to be the most infamous blackmail victim of all time.

MrGrimm888's avatar

^THAT is the danger? Some hypothetical, unlikely crap?

Bill could probably be blackmailed for hundreds of things.

You’re just making things up to be mad about.

gorillapaws's avatar

I think it’s possible that she could be involved in the death of Seth Rich if indeed he was the source of the DNC email leak.

And then you could also blame a lot of death on her cheerleading for the war in Iraq, and all of the future death that will come from her being a cheerleader for fracking, and the oil/gas industry, supporting big Pharma, the illegal actions of the current Israeli administration, and the private military industrial-complex. Add all of that up and she’s right there with some of the worst people in history.

Benghazi is ironically probably not her fault in any way.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther