Heh. I’m not sure I understand exactly how the second one’s supposed to work. It kinda depends on the person’s theory of what “meant to be with” is like.
The first one I relate to more. I remember having huge interest in people and having doubts. But I suppose it still depends on what this “meant to be with is” business is. Meant by whom? I’m highly suspicious of the agenda of whatever cosmic authority claims to know that.
In my own ideas about such things, I’d think of them more as:
* To know, immediately, correctly, and without doubt, a man/woman would be a really great match for you that would almost surely turn out well, when you see them.
* To know, immediately, correctly, and without doubt, a men/women would be a poor match for you or one that would almost surely turn out awfully, when you see them.
That makes more sense to me, and it’s a tough choice. The second one seems more practical to me, but either one would be great. I’d probably choose the first one anyway, and just try to hold out for a hit… although I might tend to start doubting whether it was really working until I got the hit.
What might have worked just as well, would be if someone had told me when I was younger some compelling stories about how much it sucks to find someone and then talk oneself out of going for it and then regretting not having gone for it. And also, how when you know someone seems to be a really bad idea to stay with, to get the heck away from them ASAP. I feel like that sort of advice could be almost as good, but then, hindsight is 20/20.