@elbanditoroso
“AI sees nothing wrong with Hamas and other regional terrorism, while it is across-the-board critical of anything Israel does.”
PALESTINE (STATE OF): ‘STRANGLING NECKS’ ABDUCTIONS, TORTURE AND SUMMARY KILLINGS OF PALESTINIANS BY HAMAS FORCES DURING THE 2014 GAZA/ISRAEL CONFLICT
By Amnesty International, 27 May 2015, Index number: MDE 21/1643/2015
“AI was far more focused on individuals imprisoned in various countries. However, from the 1970s onward, AI stopped focusing on individuals and prisoner-of-conscience situations”
Amnesty International present cases of individuals who are prisoners of conscience and victims of torture. Click open the link and look at the list on the left border of the page. If it weren’t for AI these people would be thrown into a dark hole, remain anonymous and their cases unknown to the world.
You are wrong, bandit.
As AI grew, so did their scope. They now not only investigate and report on individual victims, they investigate and report on the perpetrators of unjustified confinement and torture—the governments and orgs that commit these atrocities. It would have been irresponsible of them not to as they grew into a significant international organization.
@NerdyKeith You give Amnesty International as much money as you wish. Any one of us could become a victim at any time, especially while travelling. It is my favorite non-medical charity.
I advise you to always check a charity out by using an online, independent, non-governmental, non-profit charity reporting service. For charities headquartered in the States, there are many. I am sure the UK has many as well.
Amnesty International USA as reported by Charity Navigator, shows that 73% of their donations go to their programs, 21% to fundraising, and 6% to administrative costs. Their accountability and transparency score compared to other charities is in the 98 percentile.
Your donation will probably be going to Amnesty International UK. The stats could be different.
Nice to see you again, you corn-fed Mick.