@johnpowell “Homeboy asked and I gave a honest response. They were asking for criticism. I gave it.”
Just in case you haven’t noticed, your answer was restored. The person who removed it originally read it out of context. We apologize for the error.
@Lightlyseared “I get modded because I use British English instead of American English and that seems to upset Americans.”
I vaguely remember that. The mod in question (who is no longer on the team) was not a native English speaker and was corrected. I also seem to recall that the British spelling was allowed in the end, though I can’t confirm this since I can’t seem to find the question either. Like I said, though, I’m going on vague memory here.
@Cruiser “Being the odd man out is not an easy place to be.”
Everyone feels like the odd man out sometimes. (Even the guy with nearly 40K in lurve and an entire thread of people asking him to stay, apparently.) It’s all a matter of which responses you choose to focus on.
“my comment was in a Social thread where we typically enjoy freedom to spout off about pretty much everything”
From the Social Guidelines:
Responses <strong>must</strong>:
• Relate to the discussion
• Be respectful; you can disagree without being disagreeable
• Adhere to the writing standards
Responses <strong>must not</strong>:
• Disrupt the discussion
Although a wider spectrum of activity is allowable in this section, quality responses are still required. It’s equally moderated, just with more relaxed regulations.
Social is not a free-for-all. If you have been laboring under a false assumption to the contrary, then your confusion is certainly understandable. But there is such a thing as too off-topic for Social, and flame-bait is never okay.
“Now I would like too offer another recent example of where I fully expected my very obvious and intentionally off topic answer was going to be modded chiefly because it is on a General question and is still there.”
As far as I can tell, it is not still there. If it still appears when you look at the question, try refreshing the page. In any case, the moderators are not omniscient. We don’t read every single answer to every single question. So if nobody flags something, it can very easily stay up even if it should not. This morning, I removed some spam that was posted in 2009 (which is before I had joined the site). These things happen.
@stanleybmanly “It’s a pretty clear example of the arbitrary nature involved with the mods in determining where to draw the line.”
The underlying fallacy of your response is that it assumes everything on the site has been reviewed and approved. This is false, and there is no reasonable way of arriving at such a conclusion. That something has been removed is evidence that it was reviewed and deemed unsuitable. That something remains tells you very little at all (particularly given some of the bugs in the site that prevent us from removing certain answers even when we want to).
“Personally, I think there can be scant few legitimate excuses for depriving us of your views”
Which way the site leans is always going to depend upon the composition of the moderation team, but most (maybe even all) of the current members could be categorized as “inclusionists.” In other words, we err on the side of leaving something up rather than pulling it. That said, there is a sword always dangling above our heads: if we don’t moderate the site to Ben’s specifications, it will be shut down. Fluther was started with a particular vision, and Ben is happy to let it continue on in his absence. But he does check in on us, and he’s not going to let it keep going if it strays too far. The site is strongly tied to his brand, after all.