General Question

AshlynM's avatar

Can you explain this old photo?

Asked by AshlynM (10684points) April 26th, 2017

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/273171533622629245/
It’s of a young girl standing alone at a pond but the reflection clearly shows two girls. How is this explained? Caption says rhe photo is from 1925.
Not sure if the link will work but if not, if you wouldn’t mind taking a look at it by searching for it online.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

13 Answers

Sneki95's avatar

Photoshop existed back then. Maybe it wasn’t photoshop, but people knew how to manipulate images.
It seems like two images are fused together.

zenvelo's avatar

I can’t get a good resolution on my iPad but it looks like it isn’t a reflection, neither image in the water appear the same as the girl. So it looks more like a double print of an old phot o of the girls printed below and reverse of the girl standing

Lightlyseared's avatar

It’s a graphic created for the book
Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children. The image on the cover of the book is definitely manipulated from the original photo so I’d say it’s a pretty safe guess that this image has also been manipulated.

Zaku's avatar

One’s a ghost. Duh.

If a person wanted to fake such a photo in 1925, there are darkroom techniques that could be used. Take two photographs, one with a girl in a different place, against a plain bright background like that, taken from the same camera position via tripod. Then cut the negative of one to exclude the above-pond portion of the second girl, or even just cut out the girl, and line it up with the other negative. Make a print of the layered negative.

AshlynM's avatar

Thanks everyone.

cazzie's avatar

It’s a double exposure. It was an art form practised in the Victorian Age. I’ll find you some links if you want to see more of these types of pictures. (I have no idea why or how I know this… I wish I got paid for knowing stupid trivia) Here is one guy who faked in ghosts: https://publicdomainreview.org/collections/the-spirit-photographs-of-william-hope/

Here is more: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2012/aug/29/classic-faked-photographs-in-pictures

I studied dark room techniques and photography for two years when I was a teenager. It wasn’t difficult to super impose an image.

Strauss's avatar

It’s double exposure. It’s a technique whereby the artist manipulated the exposure of the negative and/or the print. It is not Photoshop, or any digital manipulation of the image.

LuckyGuy's avatar

When my dad was in his 20s, sometime in early 1930s, he made a picture of him talking to himself on both sides of a table. It must have been very difficult at the time because he was quite proud of it. As little kids we thought that picture was magical!
Obviously the techniques (and spoofers) have been around for a long time.

Now we can bang out something like that in seconds. Thanks Photoshop!

ragingloli's avatar

Clearly some kind of demon.

LuckyGuy's avatar

…or a window to an alternate dimension.

MrGrimm888's avatar

Females have multiple,and random personalities in play, at any given time. This photo captures the ones currently in control.

Without photos like this, men would simply have to guess which personalities are present, and act accordingly. That would be tough…;p

Hawaii_Jake's avatar

One of Loli’s friends obviously.

NomoreY_A's avatar

A ghost. No doubt about it.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther