General Question

rockfan's avatar

Does anyone else find the product placement to be completely ridiculous in Close Encounters of the Third Kind?

Asked by rockfan (14632points) September 7th, 2017 from iPhone

I rewatched the movie last night and forgot about the blatant advertising. It completely took me out the film, especially the scene in which there’s a Budweiser bottle perfectly set up on a nightstand in the foreground, while a Budweiser commercial is playing in the background. Does this bother anyone else? But I realize that that the film had some budget problems and it probably wouldn’t have been made if it weren’t for the advertising – I just wish it was done in a subtle way.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

14 Answers

catlover1221's avatar

I, too, remember the Budweiser commercial, I always laughed at it, as it was blatant. The movie itself was kinda cheesy in the backgrounds, the sounds, and the way people acted. It always had that strange, odd feel to it, which I think they were trying to make it slightly off to make it feel like something odd was going on throughout the whole movie, and the adverts added to that weirdness for me. Even the music that was played on the kid’s record player was weird…

Muad_Dib's avatar

It’s an artifact of its time. I think Wayne’s World did it well – as an added joke. These days I’m more likely to notice when a commonly-seen label is deliberately covered up, masked, or altered, because the brand in question did NOT sponsor the video.

Also, Apple must have a huge contract with certain production companies. There are films with Apple computers in places that would never use Apple computers otherwise.

rockfan's avatar

This is my all-time favorite product placement. It’s so egregious that I thought it was fake when I first saw it.

stanleybmanly's avatar

I don’t remember the Bud, though I certainly will look for it from now on. It was only after the practice sparked levels of controversy that I began keeping an eye out. If funding really was an issue, that beer can was unquestionably a small sacrifice to realize so wonderful a film, and Spielberg can now get all the money he wants for any project he chooses.

LuckyGuy's avatar

@rockfan That “commercial” was really funny. By having that hugely overweight guy eating them it might turn out to be a negative commercial and work against them.

Kardamom's avatar

It doesn’t bother me. Those products exist in that time frame, so it seems just like any other prop in the whole movie.

ragingloli's avatar

Krispy Kreme is all over the recent power rangers movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ7DReG9XoI

Dutchess_III's avatar

I never noticed it before. It was a great movie at the time, though.

ragingloli's avatar

Eh. It had 100% too few chest bursters.

Dutchess_III's avatar

At the time. That’s the key phrase @ragingloli.

rockfan's avatar

It’s still a great movie in my opinion

ScottyMcGeester's avatar

Spielberg actually likes to reference how it feels growing up in the suburbs. The advertising in some of his movies is intentional. I remember reading that Close Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial have similar suburban themes, with hundreds of references to pop culture and advertising in the background. It’s quite paradoxical. Advertising is part of every-day life and yet on another level it’s unrealistic and other filmmakers hate using it.

Dutchess_III's avatar

LOL! ET has a ton of references to Star Wars characters.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther