I have no problem with the way it is, currently. As I’ve pointed out before. I don’t need every debate to turn into a verbal blood bath of name calling. I think people can still make a their point without getting nasty and making things personal. It’s why I don’t really want it to become about social interaction and why I don’t give my personal information. I think PM allows for some personal interaction without it becoming a place of US against Them.
If I could change one thing. I would would like a vote to come up about whether someone should be dismissed from Fluther before it happening. Maybe like a small Fluther court that the Administrators pick and the offenses are laid out, and how many times they have been warned. First two warning are PM messages and instruction of the rules they broke. The 3rd a mentor is applied. Someone who may have their same views but not the need to be nasty to make their point. If that doesn’t work.then a small court of peers. The reason is because the person may have been attacked first in the thread and the person gets to explain how and why they felt they were defending themselves. If found innocent they get one last chance. After that, they get booted.
We all have our biases even if we think we don’t . And I have seen some good people booted who mean well but may be over zealous in their defense, Sometimes they aren’t even defending themselves but someone else. Yes it’s just easier to report them to the mods then not have a knee jerk reaction, but we all have those days where we just want to knock a bully. It’s human nature and although not the best way to react; it just a harder on some days not to react.
Along with those initial warnings there could be a list made of suggestions for how to handle difficult situations and maybe a list of reminders for people to remember when writing.
I have on occasion offended people without giving thought that someone on here may have a situation that I object too and they find offensive. And there will be people on here who make no apologies for their beliefs that I find offensive.
Say someone who believes that religion is for idiots, fools and for those looking to use their faith to take advantage of people. No doubt there are idiots in fools and those who take advantage that call themselves religious as there are in those who do not believe. I can take the hit but I use to fight it a lot. But it took time for me to realize that sometimes those making those comments come from a hurt past and someones belief or being in a religion is how they feel they were hurt.
There are people who are either young or old, who need guidance in how to get their point across without kicking their demons onto someone else.
It was with the help of some people on fluther, who would sometimes clue me into someones pain, that made me see how jotting down an angry response to someone with personal issues (that I wasn’t aware of) solves nothing. But it shouldn’t mean they get away with being a douche, no matter their issue. I can still rate their response as unhelpful, and needs to be reviewed. We can’t control every aspect of other peoples behavior but we can always choose how we will respond. As an adult, or as a douche.
But one thing remains clear. I didn’t create Fluther. Fluther is not mine to change. So I will go with what the creators are doing for now. It’s still pretty good.