@LostInParadise: “Words have meaning independent of who utters them.”
No, they do not. Words are tools for communication. Concocting some philosophical scenario in which the tool becomes something abstract is not useful. This isn’t a time for trees falling in forests contemplation.
@LostInParadise: “How can you presume that a white person uttering the N word is necessarily using it in a disparaging way,”
You can’t, which is precisely the point. It doesn’t matter what your intentions are. If you communicate in ways that are indifferent to how they are perceived, you are going to have to deal with the consequences.
Can you honestly tell me that you might walk up to a black woman and utter “nigger”? It doesn’t matter how well-intentioned you might be (although this raises the question of what possible intentions might be considered decent here).
Additionally, in-group use of language has utility. The use of “nigga” within a group can be used for bonding/cohesion, but can also be turned to a pejorative. Use of the term from outside the group communicates very different things.
@LostInParadise: “Imagine a mixed racial group of friends having a conversation. Why should word choice depend on skin color?”
It just does, due to the in-group vs out-group function of language.
But in all seriousness, you needn’t (or shouldn’t) make this some kind of philosophical dilemma. It’s very simple, and it involves intuitions and behaviors that you already employ. When you communicate with someone, you are likely not going to go out of your way to hurt their feelings or be insensitive, right?
Empathy. In any interaction with POC in this country, be sensitive to what they have gone through and what they are going through every day at the hands of people with pale complexions. If they are sensitive to hearing “nigger” come out of the mouth of someone who looks like you (or me), this is very easy to understand. Really.