Social Question

rebbel's avatar

Could it be that we are totally wrong, and the Universe isn't as big as we think/say it is?

Asked by rebbel (35553points) January 30th, 2019

In proportion to us, humans, the Eiffel Tower is a big construction.
As is France, as is Earth, as is the Milky Way, as are the billions of galaxies, as is the Universe.
Beetles, and ants, and bacteria, and amoebes are tiny, compared to us.
If there are giant entities that each have several Universes to play with, and we are their micro organisms, would that mean that the Universe is as big as, say, a beach ball?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

23 Answers

Tropical_Willie's avatar

I think you are missing several orders of magnitude for a beach ball. More like micro organism and the size of the Sun.

rebbel's avatar

I was afraid I would.
My first example was a tennis ball.
But you get my point, I hope.

Tropical_Willie's avatar

I think it is bigger.

Dutchess_III's avatar

OK, but what’s on the other side of that beach ball?

Tropical_Willie's avatar

The other side of beach ball is 93 billion light-years, 8.8×1023 kilometres or 5.5×1023 miles across . . . ..So tell me in 94 BILLION years when you get there @Dutchess_III.

;>) T.W.

Dutchess_III's avatar

My point is, The universe can’t be limited to one fixed point in space. There is always something else on the other side.

kritiper's avatar

No. It is as endless as time itself. And your imagination.

flutherother's avatar

Is the universe big or small? It depends on what you compare it with. The observable universe is 90 billion light years in diameter but the actual universe is 1,000 times larger than this. It’s just that we can’t see it as its light will never reach us.

ucme's avatar

Ooh you are so big, absolutely huge, we’re all impressed down here I can tell you.
No, that’s not Ron Jeremy’s first girlfriend…ya dirty bastard.

ARE_you_kidding_me's avatar

The vastness between sub atomic particles and the edge of the observable universe is incomprehensible to humans.

Darth_Algar's avatar

Even if only proportionally the Universe is still that big to us, so…

janbb's avatar

“Man is the measure of all things” says the Poet.

Inspired_2write's avatar

Trouble becomes when one Universe ends another begins, and until man physically can decipher, then its all conjecture and subjective.

Pinguidchance's avatar

@rebbel is correct in thinking it’s unlikely that the universe isn’t as big as this topic isn’t deep.

Response moderated (Flame-Bait)
Response moderated
Response moderated
Jeruba's avatar

Possible, sure: the observations and measures could all be wrong, deceived by something or someone; and there’s nothing wrong with asking. But I’m going to hang in with Hawking, Sagan, Tyson, et al., on this one. Since I’m not doing the research and study myself, it becomes a matter of confidence, and I have confidence in them.

Dutchess_III's avatar

What do they say about it @Jeruba?

Response moderated (Writing Standards)
Response moderated
flutherother's avatar

There’s an interesting discussion on the topic here

rebbel's avatar

Thank you, Jellies.
Thank you, @flutherother,I’m listening to them right now!

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther