It’s an archaic policy back when HIV was a “gay disease”, but the Red Cross refuses to let go of it. The following is an extract from an article found here.
Associate Professor and Director of Gay & Lesbian Health Victoria, Anne Mitchell spoke in front of the Anti-Discrimination Tribunal yesterday, indicating men should be assessed on what they’ve done, not who they are. The ban she said, can be likened to refusing a donor for “being Jewish or Indigenous.”
“Many of the samples in studies cited by the Red Cross are very small, recruited from men at high risk, and explicitly exclude men who practise safe sex in monogamous relationships. They are not representative of all men who have sex with men,” said Mitchell, speaking to the tribunal.
Noting a recent study which found that the chances of heterosexual HIV transmission may have been underestimated by 300%, Prof Mitchell said.
“In those whose behaviour is exclusively heterosexual, safe sex practices are less common… if there was an outbreak of HIV amongst heterosexuals in Australia it would clearly spread more rapidly than it would in the gay community.”
Considered an expert in HIV/AIDS community development work, Mitchell ran workplace workshops educating about HIV throughout the height of Australian era of ‘AIDS panic’ in the eighties, and has pushed for the safety of same-sex attracted youth in schools.
Canada and the United States continue to ban gay-men from blood donation, while Spain does not question individuals on sexual preference, only sexual practice. Spain also maintains one of the highest amount of donations in the world.
The exact law in Australia is that we aren’t allowed to donate blood if we’ve had sex with a man in the past year, or had sex with someone we thought could be bisexual.