@LostInParadise Oh the question had a coherent grammatical first form?
That’s much more interesting, but still, I think my response would be something like:
* Knowledge does not (necessarily nor only) answer the question “what?”.
* Understanding does not (necessarily nor only) answer the question “why?”.
* Wisdom does not (necessarily nor only) answer the question “how”?
* Imagination, like the others, can answer (or not) many different questions, but mainly it is not a question-answerer. If I were forced to poetically generalize and say one thing that immagination does, I might (or might not) say that immagination poses “what if?”, or more like “what about this?”.
And now that I have a clue how to relate to the current question, I might (or might not) answer:
“How does what if answer imagination?”
– I don’t think it does. It seems to me that “what if?” is a question and is not an answer to anything, unless it’s a suggested answer to some problem, but it’s still a question not an answer per se.
– And “imagination” is also generally not a question, and doesn’t itself need or accept an answer.
– There might be some other questions that some imagination might inspire.
“Like reasons why what if is the answer to imagination”
– I don’t think that “what if?” could be “the answer” to the non-question “imagination”, except in a bizarre dialog such as:
George: “Imagination?”
Socrates: “what if?”
In which case, I think the reason why Socrates gave “what if?” as an answer to “imagination?” may have been because he was feeling snarky, but I may be projecting.
To me, “what if?” is a question, which I associate more with rationality, because that’s what I tend to do with “what if?” questions.
e.g. I tend to see the imagination of dumb Hollywood movies and think “what if?” about their stupid plots, and my rational mind answers the “what if?” with “certainly not what they just showed happen! That would never turn out that way! That’s dumb – what a waste of imagination and talent and energy.”