I guess I don’t see a huge difference in universal health care, and the US military.
Think about it.
Universal health care, would help protect all American people.
The US military, helps protect all American people.
The difference between the current health care system, and the current use of the US military, is that you don’t have to have health insurance, for the military to help you. You don’t even have to show proof that you pay taxes.
If a US citizen’s life is in jeopardy, the military will try to help them. No questions asked…
A citizen doesn’t have to have military insurance, to be a reason for military action.
The US military, even helps (or tries,) citizens of other countries. Medical supplies, food, and other types of aid, are given to many other countries…
But. When it comes down to it, the US, will only give universal help, in situations where there is military involvement.
But… If the enemy is health related, our citizens are largely on their own.
The same government, that would wage war, or defend all of it’s citizens in a military issue, will not help a citizen with health issues, unless the individuals who are afflicted, have health insurance.
Yes. Emergency rooms, must stabilize a patient, regardless of insurance status. But. Those citizens, will be handed a bill…
I fail to see a difference in charging citizens for different types of enemies.
Same goes for fire departments, law enforcement, Coast Guard, etc. Although their salaries/expenditures, come from tax dollars (just like the military, ) those first responders, will act. Even if the people being saved, don’t have insurance, or pay taxes…
What is the *REAL difference?*
Malnutrition, basic health care, disabilities, mental health issues, etc, are all treated differently. But. Those issues, are just as harmful to US citizens, as any military threat…