Theory of Non-Relativity : outside the box thought. If E=MCsquared, then does energy freed of its body simply remain suspended?

@CelestialIncognito Where’s your evidence?

Light travels at the speed of light. So it is possible that light can travel through time. Or time can be stopped for light. Light can possibly be everywhere at once.

I think that the square of the speed of light is bs.
Why not cubed? Was It just a large number to sound cool.

@gorillapaws Logical truth, such that everything has an opposite. Hence, Free (bodiless) energy exists because Energy (body) exists. E=MCsquared opposite would be
Free E=Free Mass x Free Csquared. Moreover, Mass being bodiless would have no mass, and Csquared (speed of light squared) would have no speed because light having no body would not exist as we know it. Theory of Relativity hence Theory of Non-Relativity.

Meaningless babble

@CelestialIncognito Oh! Do you mean dark matter or dark energy? Or anti-particles that have negative mass?
Or some partical that has no mass at all?

Energy has to manifest itself in some way, whether as light or matter or in some other form. It does not exist in a suspended state.

No.

@CelestialIncognito “Logical truth, such that everything has an opposite.”

What’s the opposite of an apple? a chair? an elephant?

@gorillapaws A P.C.

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed but can only change form. E = mc2 is used to understand nuclear fission. If you take a uranium nucleus and add a neutron and it fissions, the atomic mass of the fission fragments and the loose neutrons do not add up to original mass of the nucleus and the neutron. The change is due to a small amount of mass being converted to energy (E = mc2). This energy is generally in the form of kinetic energy and gamma radiation. Also, during the fission process, the binding energy of the nucleus and the kinetic energy of the incident neutron are changed into different forms.
So energy can change forms. Not sure what you would call energy that is just sitting there, or if it would even be considered energy.

@RedDeerGuy1 No. No. And, no. “Particle” ensues having a body. Dark matter is a body. Dark energy requires a body. The Theory of Non-Relativity is beyond, parallel to, expands upon conventional science, if you will? To some degree, it is meaningless babble unless its language is learned. Good questions! Thank you!

@gorillapaws An apple (life) would be death. A chair (a creation) would be its maker. An elephant (life) would be death. A question would be an answer. Opposites. Thank you.

@CelestialIncognito So the opposite of a chair is a furniture-maker? But the opposite of a furniture-maker is death?

@seawulf575 How about we call it Free Energy (not to be confused with Gibbs free energy)? Imagine, if you will, the myriad of science and its processes has a source, a boson/field, that even embraces Higgs boson and field. This source is the root- aside from it, there is no other. This root having no other has no need for a name. It is the original name/name giver as one- singularity and plurality as one. Visualize the entire universe, known and unknown, is this field of free energy which animates all bodies but to varying degrees- like an old system of bumper cars at a carnival, in which these vehicles access an electrical field in the ceiling. In closing, while I asked for answers, I believe that all questions possess their answer answer(s). As such, your question/uncertainty has been helpful. Sincerely.

@gorillapaws Is the furniture maker a living person, a machine, a natural creation…? I enjoy your stream of thought. Thank you!

I strongly suspect that you are neglecting your medication. You are interspersing mystical mumbo jumbo with tongue twisting semantics and a dash of random terms common to particle physics. To what purpose?

@stanleybmanly Unification of science and religion? Interesting…

Would that it were anywhere near so lofty or esoteric. As it stands I would strongly advise you to desist from such musings (aloud) in the presence of witnesses.

@stanleybmanly Can you be more specific? Are you referring to thinking outside of the box? I do no understand.

@CelestialIncognito I have a somewhat odd view of God. It is said he is everywhere, knows what you are doing, takes actions in your life, and when you die, you will join him. What if God is the energy that binds all things together? If the measure of intelligence is the amount of energy charting across synapses, then a thunderstorm is far more advanced than a human. And it would then sound like what you are trying to describe is God. He is everywhere, as such is aware of all things at all times, could take actions to influence things if He liked, and when you die, the energy part of you that we call life would be joined with the whole since energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but can change forms.

@Celestialincognito No It wouldn’t help if I tried to be more specific. It’s bad enough that I haven’t a clue as to what you’re talking about, but the reduction of existence to an energy field with bumper car metaphors and such oddities as a theory of nonrelativity —all of it requires translation beyond my scope. It is a display of extraordinary talent for stringing words together minus any handle for extracting meaning or understanding from the effort. For me it’s the sort of dialect I remember from the heyday of recreational psychotropic drugs.

@seawulf575 I appreciate what you are sharing. No judgement, just love. Many years ago, a team of experts gave me the bad news- one year, maybe three. I searched every religious text that I could find. I searched the Great Books to cutting edge medical information. I asked for a second and third opinion from different institutions- with little change. All the while my condition worsened. Was it an investment in time I could not afford? The answer found me.

@CelestialIncognito I’m very sorry to hear of your challenges. Yet you maintain what appears to be a very calm, charitable demeanor. I think that’s called grace.