@bodyhead, et al.—
Thanks for the explanations of your intentions. See, it improves the discussion to know not only what people are thinking, but where they’re coming from. My comment about Digg users migrating over was a tad unfair… I have noticed in other threads on Fluther how the quality of discussions here have begun to drop significantly, just like they have on Digg. A lot of rancor and spite, you know? And I did take opportunity to vent.
Honestly, I have an opinion about logical fallacies. I, by no means, am perfect at following logical reasoning in all of my statements. In fact, I think it is impossible to be perfectly reasonable in one’s thinking, which is why, like you’ve pointed out, it’s so important to get perspectives from various viewpoints. So my throwing out names for fallacious reasoning is not actually trying to sound smart. I would say it’s more an exercise of sticking to sound reasoning, giving reminders to others to check their reasoning against known fallacies, and to spread the word, in a way, for learning the tools of the trade philosophers use to solidify their arguments. As this question, I believe, is primarily philosophical in nature, it’s good for us to try to maintain good reasoning, which is something absent on Digg at the moment (in my opinion).
Regarding the question at hand and your added comments about non-belief and conversion, etc., you do raise an important fact about the dynamic between believers and non-believers. You said, the difference is that the potato is real. Well, you have established that this is factually true: the potato is real. But an whole other line of reasoning would have to be established that somehow Jesus is not real. I see where you’re coming from, and in an absolute sense—meaning that what I’ve discussed about a personal relationship with Jesus Christ applies to all who have ever claimed to be Christian or those that we might term “believers” as opposed to those that subscribe to “non-belief”—in an absolute, general sense, I think your reasoning applies well. I must prove that God exists to say that another is morally bound to establish a relationship with him, or to scientifically assert that I do, in fact, have a relationship with him. Without such proof, I could be making it up.
But my point isn’t about philosophically proving that I have a relationship with Jesus Christ. In fact, I don’t know that I can prove that, just as much as I don’t know that I can prove to an outsider that I do, in fact, love my wife. I’m simply describing that to someone who truly believes that they have a relationship with Jesus Christ, and that a major source of happiness in his/her life is such a relationship, this is a reason to desire that others embrace their belief. I don’t see how one who claims to love Jesus and to feel his love in return desiring to spread the word and for others to accept their lifestyle and belief is morally wrong. Now, to assert that others are morally bound to accept their beliefs would require much more proof and reasoning, which I don’t believe is attainable with religion in general. On the grounds that I’ve had personal experience with the Christian religion, and that it has blessed my life, I wish that happiness for others, but I do not wish to force it upon anyone or to convince them one way or another. I’m merely sharing where such gestures would be accepted or wanted.
Long response. My apologies. I hope it solidifies this perspective, and I think it’s very healthy and important to continue discussion on these topics. I admit that reducing thousands of years of philosophical debate into a couple of paragraphs is audacious, so I don’t expect this to have much more value than any other anecdote floating around cyberspace, but thanks for your time and thoughts.