@gorillapaws: “So in your hypothetical, you’d lie on this form? If you happened to infect anyone and the contract tracing points back to you, then they should absolutely investigate you.”
Let’s say my fever was 99.5, and the symptoms were vague enough that “lying” would be generous.
Since you won’t provide the details of how your police-state scenario works, I’m going to try playing it out for you, I guess. I can only suspect how you’d like to this to work if you’re going to keep it a secret. I’m guessing….
- Person A dies two weeks after the flight
– The FBI/DHS does “contact tracing” for everyone Person A has had contact with in the past 2 weeks.
– The FBI/DHS somehow determine that Person A must have contacted Covid-19 during Flight 282 to Baltimore. * Note: I’m still doubtful that this is possible, and this is very problematic in this scenario.
– The FBI/DHS gets access to the medical records of everyone on Flight 282.
– They see that I got tested for Covid-19 two days after the flight and tested positive.
– I’m arrested and charged with domestic terrorism.
Even in this theoretical, it’s clear that objectively pinpointing me as the culprit is impossible. Additionally, it is so violating that any potential benefit (saving lives) is offset by handing over additional rights to entities that shouldn’t have them. The whole GW Bush “terrorism”/Patriot Act scenario fits nicely into this whole discussion.
Additionally, your intention of trying to bring awareness by setting an example has the potential to have negative public health effects, like a reduction in willingness to get tested or seek medical help for fear of spending life in prison or getting a knock on the door by jackbooted federal agencies.
And this is just one possible scenario. I can’t come up with any scenario in which there is any benefit in willingly risking public health and an expanded police state.
@gorillapaws: “No you don’t. Unless your job involves inventing a vaccine or figuring out how to produce/distribute it faster, then you don’t NEED to fly. You can drive, swim, bike, cross-country ski or travel by horse.”
Of course I need to fly to Baltimore in this scenario. I live in the US and will lose my job, and therefore my health insurance and my house. My family will be living on the streets. Both political parties have decided that it up to me to decide whether it’s worth flying to Baltimore or moving into a car.
NOTE: This is purely theoretical. I don’t actually fly for work. But I know many people who do. Daily.
@JLeslie: “Why are you flying when you are sick?! I don’t care what your sick with. Maybe as a society we can stop doing that.”
Of course. But the Democrats and Republicans want me to fly to keep my job, health insurance, food, shelter, etc.