@crazyguy
1. Corporate Tax Rate. It was 35% when Trump took over. He cut it down to 21%. Now Biden wants to raise it to 28%
- You mean the highest Corporate Tax Rate? To me, that’s but a small step in the right direction. The economy has long been dominated by overly wealthy and powerful corporations who do so mainly because of economy of scale = i.e. by virtue of size, wealth and power alone, not due to any virtue which should be further rewarded by tax savings.
See historical corporate tax rates.
I think small businesses, especially ones with minimal profits, should have lower rates, but the most profitable giant corporations should not be seeing bargain basement taxes, especially while people without corporate health care plans can’t afford medical care and go homeless due to COVID and the barbaric lack of a safety net in the US.
2. China Tariffs: Before Trump, China enjoyer PNTR (Permanent Normal Trade Relations) status. That essentially means that China paid little to no import duty. And no quotas were imposed. China took full advantage of the situation. They used their “developing nation” misnomer to impose restrictions and require 50% Chinese partnership in all foreign entities. To his credit, Biden has indicated he will continue Trump’s tough policies on China. Let us see if the liberal wing of the Democratic Party lets him.
- Ok, let’s see.
3. Illegal Immigration: Trump was greeted by tens of thousands-strong caravans on the Southern Border. So much so, that it became an emergency. He took actions much stronger than Biden could even imagine. We could disagree on the specific actions. However, the problem has been solved. undoing Trump’s actions is relatively easy. However, the consequences will not be pleasant.
- I would call many of the actions taken on the border during the Trump administration not “strong” but inhumane, cruel and terrible.
I don’t know what you’re imagining will happen with immigration during Biden’s administration, but I can’t imagine our policy and the consequences being less “pleasant” than the have been in the last four years. But I’m sure what pleases Trump supporters is rather different from what pleases me.
4. The WALL: Biden has promised that “not one foot” of wall will be built by his administration. On this issue, perhaps all Democrats who have not thought through the interplay between the Wall, asylum, and minimum wages are united. Biden can easily keep his promise. The Senate filibuster may have to be a casualty.
- The “WALL”? Not one foot? Hooray! How many feet can we remove, and when?
I think the “interplay” with the proposed “Wall” that ought to be considered first and foremost is the way it cuts through wildlife habitat and migration routes. That consideration alone is enough for me to want no wasteful and destructive wall built.
Another “interplay” I consider important, would be the way the wall has and would continue to violate native American lands, parks, and everything else in its path. I also want no wasteful and destructive wall built for those reasons.
Getting around to the intended effects of the “Wall”, it seems obvious that a giant physical wall is not going to actually stop the people that some are so excited about getting into the US.
I’m almost afraid to hear what you imagine “Democrats have not thought through” about “the interplay between the Wall, asylum, and minimum wages are united.” I’m sure I have not “thought through” it either.
5. NATO and other Alliances: We can easily go back to the way things were. Our NATO allies and others would love that as they cozy up to Mama US and suck on our kitties.
“Suck on our kitties”? Um…
So you’re not a fan of our NATO allies? You think alienating them by having a childish unpredictable Putin-chummy low-IQ jingoist POTUS was a good thing?
6. Iran Deal: Even Biden may have a tough time coaxing Iran back into a deal that they benefit from tremendously and we get zilch.
You mean since Trump kept trying to drumpf up fake reasons to attack Iran?
I take it you’re not big on diplomacy unless it’s the “cowboy” kind?
7. Paris Climate Accords: The US has almost met the goal that was assigned to it even though the US is not in the deal. Has any other country?
So you’re going to give Trump credit for US emission drops, not COVID? What part of dropping out of the Paris agreement, or any other action by Trump, would you say means Trump had anything positive to do with this outcome? Would it be his duplicitous herd immunity policy, encouraging Americans to get COVID as quickly as possible through idiotic statements like when he wanted people to get together for Easter 2020?
“We’re opening up this incredible country. Because we have to do that. I would love to have it open by Easter,” Trump said.
“I would love to have that. It’s such an important day for other reasons, but I’d love to make it an important day for this. I would love to have the country opened up, and rarin’ to go by Easter.”
In a second interview with Fox that aired Tuesday afternoon, Trump said he offered the holiday as a deadline because “Easter’s a very special day for me.”
“Wouldn’t it be great to have all the churches full?” Trump asked. “You’ll have packed churches all over our country … I think it’ll be a beautiful time.”
Trump added that “I’m not sure that’s going to be the day,” but “that would be a beautiful thing.”
At a press briefing Tuesday evening, Trump appeared to back off the idea even further. “We’ll only do it if it’s good,” Trump said, adding that he is “very much in touch” with White House experts. “I just think it would be a beautiful timeline.”
“Our decision will be based on hard facts and data as to the opening” of the economy, Trump said in that presser. “Every decision is grounded solely in the health, safety and wellbeing of our citizens.”
( https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/24/coronavirus-response-trump-wants-to-reopen-us-economy-by-easter.html )
So much “winning,” huh?