Social Question

mazingerz88's avatar

Is turning off the mic while a US veteran credits Black Americans on Memorial Day an act of racism or not?

Asked by mazingerz88 (29220points) June 4th, 2021 from iPhone

Here’s an excerpt from the NYT article by Vigdor.

============
A little more than four minutes into Barnard Kemter’s speech at a Memorial Day service organized by the American Legion post in Hudson, Ohio, an unusual thing happened: His microphone was silenced.

Mr. Kemter, 77, a retired Army lieutenant colonel who served in the Persian Gulf war, had been crediting formerly enslaved Black Americans with being among the first to pay tribute to the nation’s fallen soldiers after the Civil War when his audio cut out on Monday.

Soon after, he said in an interview on Thursday, he learned that he had been intentionally muted by the event’s organizers, who disapproved of his message.

Now, the head of the American Legion of Ohio is seeking the resignation of two of the event’s organizers, and the organization has opened an investigation into the matter.

But in an interview this week with The Akron Beacon Journal, Ms. Suchan-Rothgery acknowledged that she or Mr. Garrison — she did not specify — had turned off Mr. Kemter’s microphone for two minutes. She told the newspaper that Mr. Kemter’s narrative “was not relevant to our program for the day” and that the “theme of the day was honoring Hudson veterans.”

The episode swiftly drew international attention to the solemn observance in Hudson, a town of some 22,000 people about 15 miles north of Akron, Ohio, at a time of reckoning in the country over racial injustice.

=======

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

19 Answers

zenvelo's avatar

Yes. Evidence of structural racism where a reference to Black contributions to American heritage is considered “distracting”.

smudges's avatar

Yes. Shame on them!

TJFKAJ's avatar

From what I know about Hudson Ohio, there are so few black people in that town that some of the residents may have never seen one in their lives.

The argument is that the ceremony was to honor Hudson’s dead, not everybody else’s dead. Which means that there may be no black dead veterans that originated in Hudson. Which means they think the speaker went off topic. Seems to me that respect for dead soldiers goes beyond a white town near Akron. But what do I know?

Take it from there.

Tropical_Willie's avatar

I wonder if the the local Hudson, Ohio Oath Keepers or Proud Boys meet in the club room monthly?

Demosthenes's avatar

I mean, yeah, sounds like they were probably triggered by what he was saying, but it also sounds like he used it as an opportunity to pontificate and that wasn’t what he was supposed to be doing, even if what he was saying was true.

Tropical_Willie's avatar

You’re right @Demosthenes it didn’t support their values and prejudices.

But they will pay the price from the State American Legion.

Oh a dead soldier is still dead and it doesn’t make any difference what color their skin was before they died. The speech was about dead soldiers and not about unicorns or chili recipes.

Nomore_lockout's avatar

Of course it is. But we’ll knock back and wait for the right wing spin machine to deny it, trivalize it, claim it never happened, call it fake news, claim that the woman was misquoted, pick one..All the usual bull shit..uh, suspects I meant…

YARNLADY's avatar

Yes, racist, but “so-called freespeech” is not required at a private event. The organizers can be as racist as they want.

Inspired_2write's avatar

It’s censorship, uncalled for and badly handled.

It would had been better to have a person in charge up to that speaker and politely appreciate his sentiments and so on but that this was not the time to do so.

The speaker was taking advantage of an opportunity to air his views by using an inappropriate time to do so.

Now, perhaps the media will get involved as this was the speakers motive to get a wider audience to listen to him.

rebbel's avatar

Goes to show the immense stupidity of some people.
“Lemme click that mute button as to not let his message get to our racist (residents’) ears…”

Gets international backlash; message gets more clear and widely spread.

mazingerz88's avatar

I don’t want to assume everybody in that gathering were not interested in what the veteran had to say. Or even approved of what he wanted to point out. Selling, pontificating and what have you.

But it seems pure racism against black Americans is what motivated those who turned the mic off for two minutes, whether those black Americans were vets themselves or not it didn’t matter.

If it weren’t black American vets he talked about and white British vets or French vets, would those same organizers turn the mic off just the same?

Dutchess_III's avatar

^^ depends on how closely the organizers wanted to follow their agenda.

seawulf575's avatar

I would have to see what both sides said to make the determination. It seems a calloused thing to do at the very least…to invite a decorated veteran to speak and then cut his mic because you don’t like his views or what he is saying. Racist? Could be, but not necessarily.

mazingerz88's avatar

@smudges I wrongly assumed he talked about black American vets. I’m glad to discover there was such a very touching real act those former slaves did. Digging up bodies of Union soldiers to give them a proper burial.

smudges's avatar

Yeah, I thought that was awesome! And I wrongly assumed that Kemter was black.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther