@JLeslie I believe that the role Democratic Party (in large part at the behest of the Clintons) is a firewall against progressive change. It’s designed to ensure there is no viable political option left of the status quo. It’s why billionaires pour money into BOTH parties. Neither party is seriously considering any meaningful change to reversing the gross imbalances in wealth that have occurred since Reagan.
It’s why the Democrats win a supermajority and instead of Medicare for All, we get Romneycare rebranded as Obamacare that was dreamed up by the Heritage foundation conservative think tank in the 90’s. There will always be a Joe Lieberman or Joe Mansion or Kristin Sinema or Corey booker willing to step up to the plate to sabotage any progressive legislation from passing in DC. In fact, I think the party has more folks than not willing to step up to torpedo something progressive if they get the call.
Top marginal tax rates: in 1980 was 70%. Down sharply from the Eisenhower days (a Republican no less) where it was 90%. Reagan slashed that to 50% in 1982. And then 38.5% in 1987 (he also compressed the tax brackets downward, lumping married couples making 90k in 1987 dollars with billionaires. Bernie’s plan was 52% on income over $10m—and he gets labeled a communist. His plan is pretty close to Reagan’s tax policy for the majority of his presidency.
“You don’t think Hillary would have tried to help with fighting climate change?”
No. I think she would have passed bills that sounded like they were trying to help, but they would have been written by the oil think tank lobbying groups.Oil/gas basically spent equal money in donations to Clinton and Trump. Why? Because they win either way. We need radical environmental change yesterday. It may already be too late at this point. Token environmentalism is basically a vote for environmental devastation. If a train is headed for a crowd of people tied to the tracks, slowing it from 40mph to 39 and then pretending that you’ve made meaningful change is unhelpful and likely counterproductive.
“Help women’s rights?” maybe, but not things that really would affect women like fighting for a living wage, or universal healthcare that would disproportionately benefit women (especially women of color).
“You don’t think she supports universal health care?”
No. She said it will never, ever happen. She also took more money from big Pharma than any other candidate. More money from HMO’s/Health Services than any other candidate,
“Maybe she would not have moved the country as far as you would want it to go”
She would have maintained the status quo, just like Biden (and Trump for that matter). That means the middle class continues to evaporate, becoming even smaller than when her term started, that means more people gravitating to anti-immigrant/anti-semitic right wing populism.
But really, the worst part was that they essentially lead an insurrection on the party itself. They’ve infected the DNC with corruption and created the MAGA monster we’re all dealing with today.