Social Question
Why would FOX even be considered for the presidential debate?
FOX settled a lawsuit with Dominion (voting machine manufacturer,) for $787.5 million. This settlement, in addition to being THE largest settlement for media defamation in history, was to keep details of the news outlet’s inner workings secret. The details that did emerge, were that FOX was plagued by disseminating false news.
Details of text messages between those in the higher levels of FOX, illustrated that not only were they aware of the FACT that they were spreading lies, but were also trying to satiate viewers by lying about Trump’s loss in 2020.
Essentially. The network was acting solely as a malicious entity, that supported Trump and his base (FOX viewers,) by spreading disinformation and/or propaganda for his benefit.
Such lies, and misinformation, have been sited by many people who were investigated and/or imprisoned for their actions on J6. In other words, FOX played a role, in the attempted insurrection by Trump’s supporters. In unrelated mass shootings, or other acts of violence by Trump’s followers (around that time) also seemed to be acting on disinformation they got from FOX.
Smartmatic (another voting machine company) is also suing FOX for defamation, and is seeking $2.7 billion. Several FOX board members, have been subpoenaed, and the suit us ongoing.
FOX has settled other cases about their “toxic working environment for women.” With one former employee getting a $12 million settlement. Other’s have also been settled.
FOX has been involved in countless lawsuits o er defamation or slander, with many still pending.
As FOX News (same with MSNBC, CNN, etc,) are privately owned, and therefore they are not subject to the conduct policies of the FCC.
There ARE laws about distribution of “false information,” but these only apply to “over the air” programs on networks like FOX (broadcasting,) ABC, NBC, etc.
MOST presidential debates, are moderated by those networks, that ARE subject to laws against “distribution of false information.”
Trump, after dodging the subject of a debate, finally stated that he would ONLY attend a debate on FOX News. Obviously. This will remove the obligation of being factual, for BOTH candidates.
Many have argued, that the 2024 election, will be the most important in history.
At the least, the debate is/should be, a very serious matter. Would it be fair, to hold the debate on Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show?” (A left leaning, “entertainment” not news venue.)
As FOX, and Trump, BOTH have factual precedent (law suit results for defamation/slander,) of distributing false information, why would ANYONE (anyone wanting the debate to at least be factual) agree to hold the debate on FOX News?
Does this make one candidate appear weak, and the other strong?
Is there a reason ABC, would not be a fair venue?
- TV
- entertainment
- philosophy
- media
- power
- radio
- facts
- common sense
- freedom
- the internet
- ethics
- democracy
- Trump
- priorities
- public speaking
- hope
- strategies
- Fox News
- corruption
- honor
- advantages
- human interest
- sensibility
- fact checking
- principles
- seriousness
- subjectivity
- consequences
- American politics
- Harris
- Merica
- gas lighting
- lies v truth
- private media
- moderator(s)
- debate forums
- appropriate venues
- showmanship