I had never heard of renters needing their own insurance until about ten years ago, when a friend was renting an apartment nearby and it was specified in the lease.
30 years ago, I lived in a building that burned in a fire. The top floor of the entire building burned, and the lower floors received excessive water damage and we couldn’t return home for about a year, at which point many had moved to new places but some did go back. I remember having no renter’s insurance, but my neighbor did. She and her husband lived in a studio (I had a 1 bedroom) and they had a 30k policy, and she got handed a check for 30k, no questions asked by her broker. I remember being very envious and also sorry that I didn’t have renter’s insurance at the time, after her 30k check became a down payment on a house. I did ok after receiving help from the Red Cross, living with my parents for three months and saving up, and then getting a new, cheaper apartment, but still, it taught me a lesson.
When I got my next apartment, I contact my insurance broker about a renter’s policy. He offered me a policy for 10k. I said “no, I want 30k.” lol. It was not a whole lot more to get a 30k policy, and bundled with my auto insurance from the same company it was worth it – maybe 10 dollars a month total or something like that.
For you, with the landlord requiring you to have insurance under his or hers company, I am curious about two things. One is if you receive damage due to something that is the landlord’s fault, let’s say they have leaky pipes and it also ruins the stove or shorts out the refrigerator or something that is owned by the landlord, is your policy going to be expected to pay for his items (stove, refrigerator)? So if you have a 10k policy and get a check for 10k from the damages, is the landlord going to want those things paid for off of your money? If so, that doesn’t seem right. He or she should have their own policy to cover items that are owned by them. If there’s a fire and the insurance company is giving you a check, is the landlord going to want his items replaced by your policy? If so, that doesn’t seem right. Of course, if your negligence ruins the items owned by him, for example, you leave the tub running and it overflows and ruins the wood floor, or you leave the stove on and cause a fire, then it’s logical that your insurance pays for the damages to things he owns (floor, etc.), but if the damages are due to his negligence (leaky windows, old wiring), then it makes no sense that your policy pays for it and it comes out of what is due to you.
I also don’t understand why your landlord wants the policy to be from his company that he specifies. I wonder if he gets a kickback. Why can’t you have it with a company of your choosing, maybe one that does your auto insurance so it will be cheaper, or one you get on your own that is a low price?