General Question

janbb's avatar

Do you see any need for a second Presidential debate?

Asked by janbb (63218points) 2 months ago

As asked.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

106 Answers

jca2's avatar

This is a good question because I’ve heard talk of it and I don’t see what there is to talk about that hasn’t been talked about already.

If anything, it’s because Trump wants to have a chance to show he’s not a blathering idiot. He already showed that.

canidmajor's avatar

Not at this point. Mostly it would simply be a PR event, and a waste of time and money. If the “discussions” of pet eating and baby executions didn’t convince the cultists to take a step back, nothing will.

RedDeerGuy1's avatar

No. However maybe a vp debate.

janbb's avatar

@RedDeerGuy1 I believe there is a VP debate scheduled for October 1.

LadyMarissa's avatar

NO, zero, zip, nada!!! As Rod Stewart says The first cut is the deepest. Neither let me down & if they do a 2nd one, I won’t be watching…I’ve definitely made up my mind!!! I am still interested on the VP debate.

Love_my_doggie's avatar

No, but I look forward to the VP meet-up.

Demosthenes's avatar

Well, it would be nice to see Kamala get fact-checked on her bogus “mass rape” claims, but we know that won’t happen.

jca2's avatar

@Demosthenes The NY Times did a fact check of the statements made by both candidates in the debate.

seawulf575's avatar

The Harris/Walz team sure wants another one. They already sent out a statement suggesting one. They didn’t move the needle at all with voters which is what they really needed. Despite the lefty media trying desperately to convince everyone how great Kamala did and how great she is, real people didn’t buy it. I came across this YouTube where Fox was reviewing the debate with a panel of voters and they also had results of people reacting real time during the debate. The results show that Kamala is a train wreck. When she talks, Dems support goes up but Republican and Independent voters go way down. When Trump is talking, Repubs and Indies go up and Dems go down, but they don’t go down much. It tells me that some Dems are not fully supporting Kamala and that Indies are following almost perfectly with Repubs.

But here’s the real question: Since she got to choose the venue and the channel to hold this debate, shouldn’t Trump get to choose the next one? And if he chose Fox or even something like Newsmax would Harris refuse, showing how scared she is?

seawulf575's avatar

@jca2 Harris lied about just about everything she wasn’t dodging. She even dug up long since debunked things to try throwing at Trump: the Charlottesville Lie, the “blood bath” lie, even the J6 “incited violence” which came from the Dem lie because they refused to acknowledge that he repeatedly said to protest peacefully and patriotically. And the mediators didn’t clock her on that at all, though they did try stepping in to clock Trump a couple times. And I’m willing to bet the NYT didn’t hold her to task either.

jca2's avatar

I’m running out to the dentist but I’ll try to cut and paste the NY Times article later. I didn’t read it so I honestly don’t know what details it had. I just saw the headline and it did contain something that Harris said that it referred to as “misleading” or something like that.

Call_Me_Jay's avatar

I am pleased with the results, they can stop.

chyna's avatar

<——Real person who is buying that Kamala is great.

Call_Me_Jay's avatar

Fox was reviewing the debate with a panel of voters…The results show that Kamala is a train wreck

Let’s see what Fox News has to say about that:

Fox News voter panel says Harris won debate

JLeslie's avatar

No. I would rather Harris do some interviews and give some details. Two minute answers in a debate isn’t sufficient.

I should say Harris and Trump do some interviews. Hopefully, not “gotcha” interviews, but journalists who do their best to be neutral. Face the Nation is one that I like.

mazingerz88's avatar

Yes. For the sole reason it may deepen Harris’ connection with both swing and new voters in a positive way. Especially in the swing states.

ragingloli's avatar

The more the Orangutan humiliates himself on live TV, the better.

janbb's avatar

Trump just said he won’t do another debate. Good plan.

Response moderated (Off-Topic)
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
MrGrimm888's avatar

Wulf. Trump agreed upon the debate venue, when Biden was still the democratic candidate.
Trump tried to change the venue, but was seen (correctly) as a coward, for trying to weasel out of it.
Kamala didn’t choose anything.
She just wanted Trump to honor his original commitment.

JLeslie's avatar

@MrGrimm888 Pretty sure Harris tried to change some of the debate agreement, specifically the muted mic’s. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/09/05/harris-trump-debate-rules-2024/75086040007/

jca2's avatar

Here’s the NY Times article, which is a bunch of statements by the candidates and fact checks:

Debate Fact Check: Harris and Trump on the Economy, Immigration and Abortion
The 2024 presidential candidates clashed on their records and their visions for the country’s future in a high-stakes debate.

By The New York Times
Sept. 10, 2024

Luke Broadwater
Luke Broadwater
Congressional Correspondent, Washington

“I had nothing to do” with Jan. 6
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Trump and his allies spread lies for months about vast fraud that they falsely claimed stole the 2020 election from him. His supporters then organized a large rally near the White House designed to pressure Congress to overturn his loss. Trump encouraged the crowd to attend, promising it would be “wild.” He urged his supporters to march to the Capitol, where the rally turned into a violent riot that injured about 150 police officers. He faces federal felony charges of plotting to overturn the 2020 election and similar charges in Georgia.

Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Health Reporter

“Now she wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This needs context.
Trump is referring to Harris’s response to a 2019 American Civil Liberties Union questionnaire, in which she said she supported using taxpayer funds to give access to gender-affirming care to transgender and nonbinary people, including those in immigration detention and prison.

CNN reported on the survey earlier this week, in a segment that drew sharp criticism from supporters of gay, lesbian and transgender people. The survey asked: “As president, will you use your executive authority to ensure that transgender and nonbinary people who rely on the state for medical care — including those in prison and immigration detention — will have access to comprehensive treatment associated with gender transition, including all necessary surgical care? If yes, how will you do so?”

Harris answered yes, writing, “It is important that transgender individuals who rely on the state for care receive the treatment they need, which includes access to treatment associated with gender transition. That’s why, as attorney general, I pushed the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide gender transition surgery to state inmates. I support policies ensuring that federal prisoners and detainees are able to obtain medically necessary care for gender transition, including surgical care, while incarcerated or detained. Transition treatment is a medical necessity, and I will direct all federal agencies responsible for providing essential medical care to deliver transition treatment.”

In an interview on Tuesday morning on Fox News, Michael Tyler, Harris’s campaign communications director, sought to distance Harris from the statement without disavowing it. “That questionnaire is not what she is proposing or running on,” Tyler said.

Hamed Aleaziz
Hamed Aleaziz

“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating — they’re eating the pets of the people that live there.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
A spokeswoman for the city of Springfield, Ohio, said this week that despite viral social media posts that have been promoted by Trump and his supporters, “there have been no credible reports or specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigrant community.” A Clark County, Ohio, official said that they “have absolutely no evidence of this happening.”

Alexandra Berzon
Alexandra Berzon

“A lot of these illegal immigrants coming in —” Democrats are “trying to get them to vote.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This lacks evidence.
In recent months, Trump and other Republicans have frequently made the false claim that there’s a major crisis of noncitizens illegally voting in federal elections. They often claim, with no evidence, that Democrats are trying to get undocumented immigrants to vote in order to cheat their way to electoral victory.

In fact, people who are not U.S. citizens already face fines or imprisonment for voting in federal elections under a 1996 law. And experts point to data indicating that cases of noncitizens voting are rare and nowhere near the threshold to sway an election. Instance of undocumented people doing so are even rarer. Registrants to vote have to swear under penalty of perjury that they are citizens, and some states check for citizenship against federal databases.

Organizations including the left-leaning Brennan Center, the conservative Heritage Foundation and the libertarian Cato Institute that have examined the legal system, registration records or election offices for cases of citizenship fraud have found very few examples.

Jeanna Smialek
Jeanna Smialek
Economics Reporter

“We have inflation like very few people have ever seen before. Probably the worst in our nation’s history: We were at 21 percent.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Inflation was higher by standard measures during the late 1970s and early 1980s. The Consumer Price Index peaked at 9.1 percent in 2022, less than in that earlier episode. Analysts will sometimes argue that if one adjusts for a methodological change to how housing is measured, recent inflation has rivaled that episode, which may be what Trump is referencing. In any case, it is not true that America’s recent inflation episode is the world leader, as one can see by looking at international data

Linda Qiu
Linda Qiu
Fact-check Reporter

“All I can say is I read where she was not Black. That she put out. And I’ll say that and then I read that she was Black, and that’s OK. Either one was OK with me.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
It’s unclear what Trump read, but Vice President Kamala Harris has always identified as Black and South Asian during her time in public office. Harris wrote in her 2019 memoir that “my mother understood very well that she was raising two Black daughters.”

Harris joined Alpha Kappa Alpha, a sorority for Black women, at Howard University, a historically Black university. She was also the president of the Black Law Students Association at the University of California Hastings College of the Law. A 1999 Los Angeles Times article mentioning Harris, then an assistant district attorney in San Francisco, referred to her as a “liberal African American” prosecutor, and a 2000 San Francisco Examiner article called Harris a leader in the city’s Black community.

She first ran for public office in 2002 for San Francisco district attorney and, when she won her race, became the state’s first Black district attorney. She appeared on a panel as an emerging leader in the Black community in a 2006 conference. And in a 2009 speech to a Los Angeles-area high school about Black history, Harris spoke of her personal history as intertwined with that of the civil rights movement, alluding to how her parents “organized” in the streets during the 1960s.

Michael Crowley
Michael Crowley
Diplomatic Correspondent, Washington

“As of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone, in any war zone around the world, for the first time this century.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

This needs context.
No U.S. troops are fighting in an all-out war like the ones in Iraq and Afghanistan. But thousands of American troops have become entangled in hostilities around the Middle East since the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks.

President Biden has deployed numerous warships and fighter jets to Israel’s coast, and U.S. forces have intercepted Iranian missiles and drones fired at Israel. They have also launched dozens of airstrikes against Yemen’s Houthi militants. American forces have also suffered casualties: Three U.S. service members based in Jordan were killed in January by an attack drone, and two Navy Seals drowned earlier in February during anti-Houthi operations. Iranian-backed militias have also repeatedly attacked U.S. forces stationed in Iraq and Syria, causing multiple injuries.

Zolan Kanno-Youngs
Zolan Kanno-Youngs
White House Correspondent, Washington Bureau

“Crime here is up and through the roof.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
The claim is factually incorrect. While there was an increase in crime during the pandemic, various studies have shown violent crime has now dropped to the lowest level in decades. Despite public perception of lawlessness, violent crime was higher in 2020 under Mr. Trump than under President Biden so far. The violent crime rate was 380.7 per 100,000 people in 2022, according to police agencies’ data gathered by the F.B.I. That was a lower rate than in all but three years — 2013, 2014 and 2015 — since 1985. Preliminary analysis from the F.B.I. suggested that violent crime decreased 15.2 percent in the first quarter of 2024 from the same period in 2023, with an even greater drop of 18 percent in cities with more than one million people. Still, some studies have found that shoplifting and motor vehicle theft increased in 2023.

Kate Zernike
Kate Zernike

“Her vice-presidential pick says abortion in the ninth month is absolutely fine. He also says execution after birth. It’s execution, no longer abortion, because the baby is born is, OK, and that’s not OK with me.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Abortion terminates a pregnancy, so “abortion after birth” is a contradiction. Killing a child after birth is infanticide, which is illegal in all 50 states. Vice President Kamala Harris has said she wants to restore the abortion rights established in Roe v. Wade. Roe, the 1973 Supreme Court decision overturned in 2022, allowed states to prohibit abortion in the third trimester — the seventh, eighth and ninth months of pregnancy — so long as they made exceptions to save the health and life of the mother. “Late term” is defined as 41 weeks, or just beyond nine months. According to federal data, less than 1 percent of all abortions take place after the 20th week of pregnancy; 93 percent are at or before 13 weeks. Minnesota, where the Democrat vice-presidential nominee, Tim Walz, is governor, is one of the few states to allow abortion at any stage of pregnancy. But allowing abortions at that stage does not mean that doctors perform them. State data for 2022, the most recent available, shows that of the 12,175 abortions in the state that year, only two happened between 25 and 30 weeks of pregnancy, and none after the 30th week of pregnancy, which is roughly the start of the third trimester.

Ben Protess
Ben Protess

“Every one of those cases was started by them against their political opponent.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Trump’s claims that the Biden administration orchestrated his four criminal cases, including the one in Manhattan that led to his conviction in May on charges of falsifying records to cover up a sex scandal, has no basis in fact.

The Manhattan investigation began while Trump, not President Biden, was in office. The case was brought by the district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, a local Democrat who does not answer to Biden or Vice President Kamala Harris. The same goes for Trump’s criminal case in Georgia, where a district attorney accused him of trying to overturn the 2020 election results in that state. And Trump’s two federal cases were brought by a special counsel, a semi-independent prosecutor who is accountable to the attorney general. While the attorney general is chosen by the president, the White House has no direct influence over the special counsel.

Alan Feuer
Alan Feuer

All of Trump’s legal challenges to the outcome of the 2020 election were dismissed on “technicalities” or the basis of “standing.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is false.
While some of the challenges to the last election were rejected on the basis of standing — that is, on the issue of whether the plaintiffs had the legal right to question the results and assert they had been harmed — there were some cases that were decided on the merits of whether there were improprieties in the race. And none of those cases were decided in Mr. Trump’s favor. One of the merits cases was decided in Wisconsin by Brett H. Ludwig, a federal judge appointed by Mr. Trump. “This court has allowed the plaintiff the chance to make his case,” Judge Ludwig wrote in his ruling, “and he has lost on the merits.”

Julian E. Barnes
Julian E. Barnes
Domestic Correspondent

“Putin endorsed her last week, said, ‘I hope she wins.’”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is misleading.
Most observers believe that Vladimir V. Putin’s comments on Sept. 5 that he supported Vice President Kamala Harris were said in jest. The U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that Putin supports the election of Trump. Documents released as part of an indictment against two employees of the Russian state broadcaster show the Kremlin developed a plan to influence swing state voters in favor of Trump. The Kremlin believes Trump will cut back, or end, U.S. military aid to Ukraine. While Trump has claimed that the invasion of Ukraine would not have taken place if he were president, there is little evidence that he would have taken action to deter Russia.

Helene Cooper
Helene Cooper
Pentagon Correspondent

“They sent her in to negotiate with Zelensky and Putin, and she did, and the war started three days later.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
The vice president traveled to the Munich Security Conference in February 2022, in the days before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that month. President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine was there, and Harris met with him. Putin was not present.

Margot Sanger-Katz
Margot Sanger-Katz
Health Policy Reporter

“When Donald Trump was president, 60 times he tried to get rid of the Affordable Care Act — 60 times.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

False.
As president, Trump did try to get rid of the Affordable Care Act, urging Republicans in Congress in 2017 to pass several bills to repeal and replace major portions of it. Those efforts were ultimately unsuccessful. Republicans in Congress had voted many times since the health law was enacted in 2010 to fully repeal or substantially modify Obamacare. Most of those attempts predated Trump’s presidency. Various analysts have tallied those efforts at 70, or even 100. But those very high counts include even proposed changes to the landmark legislation that were relatively minor — and some that had bipartisan support. Most failed to become law.

Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Health Reporter

“I had a choice to make” on Obamacare. “Do I save it and make it as good as it can be? Or do I let it rot? And I saved it. I did the right thing.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Trump did not “save” the health insurance law known as Obamacare; the United States Senate did, in defiance of him. During his first year in office, Trump asked Congress to pass legislation repealing the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 law that created the program. The Republican-controlled House approved the bill. But in a dramatic moment on Capitol Hill, Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican and nemesis of Trump, cast the decisive vote to defeat the proposal, just days after returning to the Senate after receiving a diagnosis of brain cancer. The vote was a surprise to Trump; he had cheered McCain’s return to Washington in a social media post calling the Arizona senator “brave” and a “hero,” apparently believing that he had come back to Congress to help kill — not save — Obamacare.

Andrew Duehren
Andrew Duehren

“Over the last four years, we have invested $1 trillion in a clean energy economy.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

This is misleading.
The current administration has facilitated a burst of private investment because of tax credits and other incentives included in the Inflation Reduction Act passed in 2022. According to the Clean Investment Monitor, which tracks investments, clean energy investment since 2021 has totaled roughly $700 billion. Some experts expect the clean energy incentives to eventually help drive more than $1 trillion in private investment.

Linda Qiu
Linda Qiu
Fact-check Reporter

“Donald Trump, the candidate, has said in this election there will be a blood bath if this, and the outcome of this election, is not to his liking.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

This needs context.
Harris is correct that Trump warned of a “blood bath” if he did not win the 2024 election, but Trump has contended that he was speaking about an economic blood bath and was focused on competition from Chinese electric vehicles.

Here is the full quote of what Trump said at rally in March, so readers can decide for themselves.

“If you’re listening, President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal, those big monster car manufacturing plants that you’re building in Mexico right now, and you think you’re going to get that, you’re going to not hire Americans and you’re going to sell the cars to us, we’re going to put a 100 percent tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected,” he said.

“Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a blood bath. That’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a blood bath for the country. That’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars,” he continued.

Linda Qiu
Linda Qiu
Fact-check Reporter

“We have millions of people pouring into our country from prisons and jails, from mental institutions and insane asylums.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This lacks evidence.
Immigration experts have said they could not corroborate Mr. Trump’s claims. The Trump campaign has previously cited a September 2022 article in Breitbart, a conservative website. One unnamed source told Breitbart that officials believed an unspecified number of Venezuelan prison inmates were headed for the United States’ southern border with Mexico. (No other news organization or government source has verified this report.)

The campaign also pointed to reports warning that Tren de Aragua, a transnational criminal gang founded in Venezuela, was growing in the United States. But none of this is evidence that “millions” of criminals are infiltrating the southern border.

Customs and Border Protection reported apprehending 47 members of Tren de Aragua along the southern border under Mr. Biden. Prison populations all over the world have been increasing, not decreasing. Penal Reform International, a Netherlands-based nonprofit, estimated that the global prison population was a record 11.5 million in 2023, an increase of 500,000 people since 2020.

Linda Qiu
Linda Qiu
Fact-check Reporter

“For years we were paying almost all of NATO. We were being ripped off by European nations, both on trade and on NATO. I got them to pay up.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is misleading.
Trump incorrectly characterizes the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Member countries make direct contributions to the organization, based on national income, and also agree to spend at least 2 percent of their gross domestic product on their own defense.

Trump’s complaints led to NATO reducing the United States’ contribution to the common fund. Previously the United States paid about 22 percent of its central budget, and it dropped to 16 percent. And the number of countries meeting that 2 percent guideline increased to 10 from five in recent years.

Trump can claim some credit for increased spending, but it’s worth noting that countries pledged in 2014 to meet that goal within a decade.

Jim Tankersley
Jim Tankersley
White House Correspondent

“The Trump administration resulted in a trade deficit — one of the highest we’ve ever seen in the history of America.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

This is misleading.
In 2020, at the end of Donald J. Trump’s tenure in office, the trade deficit — the difference between how much the United States imports and how much it exports — was about $650 billion. That was lower than four years of the George W. Bush administration, and the first three years of the Biden-Harris administration.

Brad Plumer
Brad Plumer

“We had the largest increase in domestic oil production in history, because of an approach that recognizes that we cannot over-rely on foreign oil.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

This needs context.
U.S. crude oil production has indeed risen to record highs this year, though experts say that has little to do with actions taken by the Biden administration. Most oil production has occurred on private and state lands, where the federal government has little oversight. At times, President Biden has actually tried to restrict drilling on federal lands and waters in the name of tackling climate change, but the courts have frequently limited his ability to do so.

Lisa Friedman
Lisa Friedman

Biden “ended the XL pipeline, the XL pipeline in our country. He ended that.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This needs context.
On his first day in office, President Biden rescinded the construction permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline, which would have transported carbon-heavy oil from the Canadian oil sands to the Gulf Coast. That same day, the sponsor of the project, TC Energy, a Canadian company, said that it was suspending work on the line.

Trump had revived the project after it stalled under the Obama administration, but it continued to face legal challenges that hampered construction. Opponents had fought the project for years over concerns that burning oil sands crude could make climate change worse and harder to reverse.

Ben Protess
Ben Protess

I “have built it into many, many billions of dollars; many, many billions.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is exaggerated.
Trump habitually exaggerates his wealth, so much so that the New York attorney general’s office sued him for fraudulently inflating his net worth, a case that led to a more than $450 million judgment against him.

In reality, he has about $400 million in cash, stocks and bonds, though if the New York case is upheld on appeal, it will essentially wipe out his liquid assets.

Much of his purported net worth is tied up in the real estate he owns. So when Trump says he is worth many billions, he appears to be referring to the value of that property. But property values fluctuate, and there is no reliable assessment of his assets. He also has a roughly $2 billion stake in his social media company, though he can’t yet access those shares and their value has plummeted in recent months.

Michael Crowley
Michael Crowley
Diplomatic Correspondent, Washington

“She wouldn’t even meet with Netanyahu when he went to Congress to make a very important speech. She refused to be there because she was at a sorority party of hers.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is misleading.
It is true that when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel addressed Congress on July 19, Vice President Kamala Harris did not attend the speech. On that day she delivered a long-planned speech in Indiana to the national conference for Zeta Phi Beta, one of the country’s historically Black sororities. But Harris returned to Washington the next day for a meeting with Netanyahu.

Linda Qiu
Linda Qiu
Fact-check Reporter

“And when she ran, she was the first one to leave because she failed” in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary.
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Harris dropped out of the Democratic primary in December 2019, which came as a surprise given expectations surrounding her candidacy. But her exit was preceded by more than a dozen others, including prominent members of Congress, former and sitting governors and the mayor of New York City.

Linda Qiu
Linda Qiu
Fact-check Reporter

“She went out in Minnesota and wanted to let criminals that killed people, that burned down Minneapolis.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is misleading.
After the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis and the protests that ensued, Vice President Kamala Harris posted on social media in June 2020 asking supporters “to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota” by donating to the Minnesota Freedom Fund, a bail fund.

The fund used some of those money to bail out people who committed serious crimes. But Ms. Harris did not specifically call to release murderers from behind bars.

Michael D. Shear
Michael D. Shear
White House Correspondent, Washington

“Remember that she was the border czar. She doesn’t want to be called the border czar because she’s embarrassed by the border.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Harris was never appointed “border czar,” nor was she tasked with addressing border security. Rather, she had a role in addressing the root causes of migration in Central American countries. Moreover, she did visit the border in June 2021, where she toured an immigration facility in El Paso.

Alan Feuer
Alan Feuer

“By the way, Joe Biden was found essentially guilty on the documents case.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
A special counsel, Robert K. Hur, was appointed by Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to prosecute President Biden after his aides reported that classified documents from his time as vice president had been found in his possession. Hur spent months investigating Biden and in February issued a report in which he declined to bring charges against Biden for a number of reasons. Among them was that Biden, unlike Trump, cooperated with the federal inquiry into his handling of classified documents.

Elizabeth Dias
Elizabeth Dias

“And as far as the abortion ban, no, I’m not in favor of abortion ban.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is misleading.
Trump privately expressed support for a 16-week abortion ban earlier this year, although he later reviewed polling suggesting it was problematic, and did not support it. His allies, including former Trump administration officials, have also planned new sweeping abortion restrictions that do not require a national ban passed by Congress. One plan includes enforcing a long-dormant law from 1873, called the Comstock Act, to criminalize the shipping of any materials used in an abortion — including the medication used in the majority of abortions in America.

Lisa Friedman
Lisa Friedman

“Fracking? She’s been against it for 12 years.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is misleading.
During her first presidential campaign in 2019, Harris endorsed a ban on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a process used to extract oil and natural gas from bedrock. She also challenged federal approvals of offshore fracking when she was attorney general of California. When she became President Biden’s running mate in 2020, she distanced herself from that position, and now says she no longer supports a ban on fracking.

Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Health Reporter

“We made ventilators for the entire world.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This needs context.
Early in the pandemic, the Trump administration was criticized for a shortage of ventilators. In March 2020, Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, was put in charge of an effort to ramp up production. Trump later announced a plan to make the United States the “king of ventilators” by donating them to other countries. But ProPublica reported that while White House officials had pushed the U.S. Agency for International Development to purchase thousands of ventilators and donate them abroad, the effort was “marked by dysfunction.”

In the end, the ventilators weren’t needed. By May 2020, doctors began using ventilators only as a last resort, after observing unusually high death rates for Covid-19 patients who were put on the devices. The Associated Press quoted Daniel Edelman, a professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, as saying the Trump administration was buying more than twice the number of ventilators it needed.

Helene Cooper
Helene Cooper
Pentagon Correspondent

“People give me credit for rebuilding the military.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is exaggerated.
Trump’s allies often repeat his talking point that he “rebuilt” the military. He did increase the defense budget during his four years in office, by around $225 billion. But he also promised to build a 350-ship Navy and to expand the Army. He did neither. The Army today is at its smallest size since 1940. The year Mr. Trump left office, the Navy was down to 294 ships. Efforts to expand the number of Air Force squadrons received no presidential push and went nowhere.

Linda Qiu
Linda Qiu
Fact-check Reporter

“I have nothing to do with Project 2025.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This needs context.
Project 2025, a set of conservative policy proposals assembled by a Washington think tank for a Republican presidential administration, does not directly come from Trump or his campaign. Still, CNN documented that 140 people who worked for the Trump administration had a role in Project 2025. Some were top advisers to Trump in his first term and are all but certain to step into prominent posts should he win a second term.

Trump has also supported some of the proposals, with some overlap between Project 2025 and his own campaign plans. Among the similarities: undercutting the independence of the Justice Department and pressing to end diversity, equity and inclusion programs. And he enacted other initiatives mentioned in Project 2025 in his first term, such as levying tariffs on China and making it easier to fire federal workers. Trump has criticized some elements as “absolutely ridiculous and abysmal,” though he has not specified which proposals he opposes.

When the director of the project departed the think tank, Trump’s campaign released a statement that said, “Reports of Project 2025’s demise would be greatly welcomed and should serve as notice to anyone or any group trying to misrepresent their influence with President Trump and his campaign — it will not end well for you.”

Jeanna Smialek
Jeanna Smialek
Economics Reporter

“We handed them over a country where the economy and with — the stock market was higher than it was before the pandemic came in. Nobody’s ever seen anything like it.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This needs context.
The economy grew at a fairly normal pace in the United States in the years leading up to the pandemic, and while the stock market did touch new highs under Trump’s watch, that is typically the case during a presidency: Historically, stock prices tend to climb over time. Stocks have traced new highs under the Biden administration, as measured by the S&P 500 index.

Kate Zernike
Kate Zernike

“Every legal scholar — every Democrat, every Republican, liberal, conservative — they all wanted” abortion policy “to be brought back to the states.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Some conservative legal scholars asked the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that identified a right to abortion in the Constitution. They said state legislators, not unelected justices, should set abortion policy. But many legal scholars also filed briefs urging the court not to do so, arguing that the original decision had been on solid legal ground and that overturning federal protection for abortion would disastrously reverse five decades of precedent.

Zolan Kanno-Youngs
Zolan Kanno-Youngs
White House Correspondent, Washington Bureau

Immigrants are “coming in and they’re taking jobs that are occupied right now by African Americans.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

This is misleading.
Various economists have found that immigrants are a crucial part of the U.S. labor force and that their presence has been healthy for the nation’s economy. The population of foreign-born workers is also not large enough to offset job creation over the past three years. A few studies have indeed shown negative wage effects, particularly on Black workers and other Americans in occupations in which there are many immigrants. But while this dynamic has been debated for decades, there is no clear conclusion.

Several studies have, however, found a mutually beneficial relationship between high-skilled immigrants and similarly skilled U.S.-born workers, as well as between low-skilled immigrants and more highly skilled U.S.-born workers, contributes to higher wages for natives. Economists also have found immigrants are especially important as more Americans age and leave the labor force.

Michael D. Shear
Michael D. Shear
White House Correspondent, Washington

Immigrants are “taking over the towns. They’re taking over buildings. They’re going in violently.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.

The claim is factually incorrect. The former president was referring to towns in Ohio and Colorado that have seen large influxes of immigrants, most of whom came into the United States legally, often with work permits. There have been examples of crime in those cities, but the vast majority of the immigrants have been working and paying taxes. In Springfield, Ohio, for example, thousands of Haitian immigrants have helped fill jobs as the city recovered from steep economic decline, but their presence has divided the town politically. A traffic accident caused by a Haitian immigrant has roiled the city, but there has not been widespread violence, and many in the city support the Haitian migrants as an important part of the economy.

Linda Qiu
Linda Qiu
Fact-check Reporter

“She’s a Marxist. Everybody knows she’s a Marxist.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Marxism refers to the political, social and economics theories of Karl Marx, practiced as socialism or communism. Ms. Harris’s campaign has described her as a capitalist. She has not proposed to seize the means of production. And she has received the backing of more than 80 chief executives, some of whom have called her “pro-business.”

Jim Tankersley
Jim Tankersley
White House Correspondent

“The only jobs they got were bounce-back jobs.”
— Former President Donald J. Trump

False.
Trump claimed that the only jobs created under the Biden-Harris administration were from recovering jobs that were lost under Trump amid the pandemic recession. In fact, under the Biden administration, the American economy has regained all the jobs it lost from before the pandemic and created nearly 6.5 million additional jobs on top of that.

Jim Tankersley
Jim Tankersley
White House Correspondent

“Donald Trump left us the worst unemployment since the Great Depression.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

False.
Unemployment spiked to its worst levels since the Great Depression in the pandemic recession of 2020, but it was 6.4 percent the month Trump left office. That’s nowhere near the worst rate since the Depression.

Shawn Hubler
Shawn Hubler
California Correspondent, National

“This business about taking everyone’s guns away — Tim Walz and I are both gun owners.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

This is true.
A career prosecutor in California before she ran for the U.S. Senate, Harris has long said that she owns a handgun. “I am a gun owner, and I own a gun for probably the reason a lot of people do — for personal safety,” she told reporters outside a campaign event in Iowa during her run for the White House in 2019.

Although she has long called for universal background checks, a ban on assault-style weapons and other controls, she has not called for seizing legally purchased firearms. Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, her running mate, is an Army veteran and a hunter who was endorsed by the National Rifle Association until he began supporting tighter firearm restrictions after a teenage gunman opened fire at a Florida high school in 2018.

“I was a better shot than most Republicans in Congress and I have the trophies to prove it,” he said. “But I’m also a dad. I believe in the Second Amendment, but I also believe that our first responsibility is to keep our kids safe.”

Jim Tankersley
Jim Tankersley
White House Correspondent

“He lost manufacturing jobs.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

This needs context.
The United States had lost nearly 200,000 factory jobs at the end of Donald Trump’s presidency compared with when Trump took office. Those losses were largely a product of the pandemic recession.

Jim Tankersley
Jim Tankersley
White House Correspondent

“We have created over 800,000 new manufacturing jobs.”
— Vice President Kamala Harris

This is misleading.
Since President Biden took office, seasonally adjusted manufacturing employment has increased by 739,000 jobs. Previous estimates put that increase above 800,000, but that number fell after the Labor Department issued an annual revision to its jobs numbers last month.

Blackwater_Park's avatar

I’ll say yes, it’ll continue to position and cement the swing vote. If Kamala can continue to dispell the idea she is a moron then it will help her greatly. I don’t really like Kamala but I dislike Trump more. I really don’t like the idea of putting another dangerously old person in office. You can call me ageist. That“s fine.

Forever_Free's avatar

It is a complete waste of time and making a mockery of what a debate is for.

chyna's avatar

^True. They taught us how to debate in 8th grade. It was nothing like what has been passing lately as a debate.

Dutchess_III's avatar

I want to see one so trump can double down on dogs and cats and abortion after birth.

seawulf575's avatar

@jca2 Thank you for the transcript from the NYT. As I suspected it is entirely biased. I went back to rewatch the debate, specifically looking for times Harris lied. In the first 28 minutes, I had her at 8 flat-out lies, 4 partial truths with the moderators pitching in a couple bogus fact checks.

If you look what the NYT gave you, it is misleading as hell. They said she only lied twice (maybe 3 times) in the whole debate with a couple “misleading” statements which they go on to explain but which sounds like she lied. They don’t want to say she lied.

The lies I identified are:
1) Donald Trump wants a 20% sales tax on all goods people buy.
2) Donald Trump left us the worst unemployment since the Great Depression
3) Project 2025 is Trump’s plan
4) Donald Trump hand selected 3 SCOTUS justices with the express purpose of overturning Roe v Wade. (POTUS nominates, Senate has to approve so this is already deceptive. There is no evidence anywhere that Trump ever even discussed RvW with any of his three appointments).
5) She said there there were 20 states with Trump abortion bans. There is no such thing.
6) She claims Trump wants no exceptions for abortions due to rape or incest. This had been debunked many times.
7) She claims for a second time (even after being corrected the first time) that Trump’s plan is Project 2025
8) She claims Trump would outlaw IVF as part of his abortion ban. ???

And that was just in the first 28 minutes. And I didn’t list the partial truths or even the bogus fact checking from the moderators. The problem is that the MSM doesn’t ever want to report on things like that. They don’t want to hold Harris accountable for anything she says.

Response moderated (Unhelpful)
Response moderated
Response moderated (Off-Topic)
Response moderated (Off-Topic)
Response moderated
Response moderated (Personal Attack)
Response moderated (Personal Attack)
Forever_Free's avatar

@seawulf575 The lies you listed are typical deflection of questioning Trump lies. His words are out there wide open for all to hear. He also defends his lies and buries himself deeper when he does (a common trait of liars).

Response moderated (Off-Topic)
Response moderated (Off-Topic)
Response moderated
Response moderated
seawulf575's avatar

@Forever_Free Yes, and the lefty media makes sure to clock every single one. Yet all those were from Kamala. How many of them did the moderators correct her on? How many did the NYT call lies? How many did they even mention? That is the problem with the left wing media.

I’m not deflecting Trump’s lies, but I’m pointing out there are just as many Kamala lies and maybe more. I only went through the first 28 minutes of the debate to get all that I listed. I’m pointing out how biased the left wing media is and why all of you try to deflect from that and why you feel it’s okay to get outraged and make a huge deal of Trump lying and completely ignore Kamala (or Biden or really any Democrat) lying. I’ll give you the same challenge as the other two jellies: Why are you defending Harris when it is plain she lies, probably more than Trump? Is lying only bad when Trump does it and totally acceptable when a Democrat does it?

MrGrimm888's avatar

^It’s interesting, that you think linking Trump to Project 25, is the same as saying that black people from a “shithole country,” have “invaded” Springfield OH, and are “eating their pets.”

Trump is without ANY question, a habitual liar, and spreader of false information. Often inciting division and violence.

Harris, for whatever you or I think of her, simply doesn’t have the same well deserved reputation of Trump in the lying department. If she’s POTUS for 8 years, and lies even while sleeping, she might get close to the amount of total baseless nonsense Trump bellows.

It reminds me, of why you say we have to prioritize the southern border, over the northern border. I say, it’s because brown people come from the southern border.
You say, it’s clearly a bigger threat.

Harris, as a government official, should ALWAYS be held accountable for not lying, pr spreading misinformation.
However. The exponentially bigger threat to lie, and spread misinformation, was Trump.

And he did lie, and spread misinformation. Again. Not the type of lies, that are bending numbers or misrepresenting policies, but lies that have/will/are getting people hurt.

PLEASE. Stop acting like Trump, is someone who deserves the respect or leeway, typical people in his position do.

Harris, was a DA.

Trump, is a lifelong criminal, conman, sexual predator, AND (in case YOU haven’t noticed,) he’s growing more unhinged and showing signs of violent dementia.

Response moderated
elbanditoroso's avatar

If I were an advisor to Harris, I would tell her not to do a second debate. Quit while you’re ahead

janbb's avatar

I totally agree. Now she should drill down on some in-dept interviews.

seawulf575's avatar

@MrGrimm888 “Harris, for whatever you or I think of her, simply doesn’t have the same well deserved reputation of Trump in the lying department.” EXACTLY. And why is that? Is it because she doesn’t lie? No, that is verifiably false. I already proved that. Or is it because the media just plain doesn’t hold Democrats accountable to the same level they do Trump? What if you went back and did an honest evaluation of Harris. Would it show she didn’t lie at all? Or would it show she lied her ass off when you apply the same standards as are applied to Trump?

I’m all for holding politicians accountable for lying. Yet that only seems to go one way with the MSM.

And, BTW, you never really did take the challenge I gave you. You never answered why you are defending Harris when I already showed numerous lies she told, lies you really can’t say were truths without really twisting things entirely out of reality. You never answered if it is only because lying is a problem when a Republican or Trump does it, but it is totally acceptable from a Democrat. Go ahead, tell the truth here and shame the Devil.

Response moderated (Personal Attack)
Response moderated (Unhelpful)
MrGrimm888's avatar

Wulf.
Unfortunately, your opinions on Harris’ words, do not equate to fact checking. You proved little, if anything, by expressing YOUR views. We all know, how you view Harris, and why.

Pointing out truths about Trump’s differences from Harris, to me doesn’t count as “defending Harris.”

I wasn’t saying anything untrue about Trump. You know that.
He’s a special case. His reputation, is something he worked VERY hard to earn.
The crazy old man, allows us to trace his bathroom habits, by posting things on social media at all ours of the day or night.
He never tires, of trying to be heard, and get attention.
Like a toddler, he knows how to get bad attention, and any attention is “good.”

Looks like he got some more attention on his golf course recently. Trump keeps inciting violence, division, and instability, and now he’s had a second person try to kill him for it…

seawulf575's avatar

@MrGrimm888 They aren’t my opinions on her words. Where I said she lied, she lied. If you think Trump has said he wants a 20% sales tax, then show me the plan. If you think he created Project 2025, again…show me your proof. Ditto that for any and all things I said were a lie. But you are incapable of independent thought, apparently. You want to hide behind goofy claims about me just so you can avoid actually having to consider that the media is completely biased. I know that is how you are and all I can do is pray for you that your therapy helps with being able to deal with reality.

MrGrimm888's avatar

^And what “goofy claims,” have I made about you Wulf?

seawulf575's avatar

Stay with the convo. Your goofy claim that I posted only my opinions. As I said, everything I called a lie is verifiable as a fact. Pick any of what I called lies and show me how they are only opinion…or even that they are truths and not lies.

You seem to think I’m somehow defending Trump. I’m not. I’m suggesting the media is lying and manipulating when they only attack one side and let the other get away with everything. And in this case, it is a lie that keeps building on itself. They don’t bother fact checking Harris so they can say she didn’t lie and use their fact check of only Trump as proof that they fact checked. Then, when she lies again, with the same stuff, they can just ignore it…again. The media is doing exactly what you are doing. You refuse to look at reality so you don’t have to talk about it. And then you try deflecting to Trump and use the fact checks of him as proof that the manufactured lie you’ve been told is true. You claim the new lie as fact and continue building on that. It’s time to break the cycle. It isn’t Trump or Harris…it’s the media. Hell, there’s even a whistleblower that has come forward and given a sworn affidavit saying that ABC coordinated with Harris to decide what questions to ask, let Harris have editorial decision making on that, and that they (the moderators) would really go after Trump. This isn’t really an opinion of mine, these are things that are happening.

jca2's avatar

@seawulf575 I haven’t seen that about the whistleblower. Do you have a link or a name so I can google?

Response moderated (Personal Attack)
Response moderated
Response moderated (Unhelpful)
ragingloli's avatar

@Tropical_Willie
It’s just another facet of the misogynist sewage that the right wing throws at the wall.
Remember how they claim that Harris slept her way to the top?
It is this idea that because she is a woman, she can not possibly have earned her career, and can not possibly be able to prepare for a debate with questions that any 5th grader would anticipate being asked. No, she had to have been given access to the questions beforehand, because there is no way she could have predicted obvious questions and topics like the former prosecutor that she is.
And imagine how deluded you have to be to even entertain the laughable thought that the Harris campaign would have this fictitious “whistleblower” killed over leaking debate questions to Harris.

Dutchess_III's avatar

So paranoid….

Forever_Free's avatar

@Forever_Free I accept your challenge. My vote is based on track history and who and what the candidate cares about. Period the end.
The lies and flies that come out of Trump’s mouth are simply preposterous.
He is a bombastic windbag.
His intelligence on things or lack thereof is proof enough for me who the better candidate is.

seawulf575's avatar

@Forever_Free Yes, it’s easy to say Trump lies all the time…you have the media stretching everything into a lie whether it is or not. But have you ever actually fact checked a Democrat? I did. I just listed 8 lies by Harris in just the first 28 minutes of the debate. Basically every time she started talking a lie came out. It was amazing. And not a single left wing outlet clocked her on it.

Your answer here was not an acceptance of the challenge, it was a dodge. The challenge was about Harris, not Trump. All you can do is slam Trump. You are doing what every other TDS case on these pages does. Avoiding even considering reality.

janbb's avatar

It all had very little to do with anyone’s fact checking or the media distorting things. We all saw what he said and how he obfuscated and lied. Vance has admitted that the dogs and cats which has done serious harm to a whole community was made up. Nobody has to worry about the MSM; we can see with our own eyes. Even conservative pundits agreed that Trump lost.

Response moderated (Off-Topic)
Response moderated (Off-Topic)
MrGrimm888's avatar

Wulf. I know you don’t care for the NYT article @jca2 posted, but I felt that was as close to fair/unbiased, as any analysis could be.
I suggest that you read it again, or perhaps for the first time.

I’m not a journalism student either, but your fact checking, was first of all one sided. I’m not sure how you can act unbiased, by only harping on Harris.
Not to mention, you just called everything an outright lie.
The NYT article, was clear, and concise. Many of their statements, DID require clarification or context.

I know that Trump is doing everything he can, to distance himself publicly from P25, but Trump would have to seperate himself from conservatives, to make that trip.
Nope. P25, is a conservative agenda playbook, and Trump has already started helping make P25 come to fruition.

You also cannot accurately proclaim Trump’s stance on abortion, as he himself, keeps changing his mind on the details.
But. Yes. He did stack the SCOTUS, and we’ve already witnessed why.
He already went after Roe v Wade.
He’s already been protected by the courts, from facing prosecution for his potential crimes.
In courts Trump hasn’t stocked, he’s not doing so well. Whenever possible, his judges help him.

The clear and present corruption of the current SCOTUS, has led to efforts to provide the court with oversight, and rules for conduct. Something that both the SCOTUS, and Republicans, have been fighting hard.

Keep us up to date, on the latest right-wing fake news. It’s ALWAYS entertaining, what conservatives will believe…

seawulf575's avatar

@MrGrimm888 I did read it. She mentioned she saw it, I commented that I figured it would be biased, she posted it, I read it, and it was. Just look at it:

The comment made by Trump that Harris ”...wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison.”. The NYT says this comment needs context. It then goes on to show where she has proposed this and/or supported it, in writing. The only contradiction is that her campaign rep, in an interview, said that isn’t what she is running on. So in other words, Trump was right, but they won’t say that.

Trump says “We have inflation like very few people have ever seen before. Probably the worst in our nation’s history: We were at 21 percent.” The NYT calls it false. They go back and found a couple times where it was worse. Fair enough. So where is the fact check when Kamala claims Trump gave them the worst unemployment since the Great Depression? That is verifiably false as well. But they didn’t fact check that.

Trump said: “All I can say is I read where she was not Black. That she put out. And I’ll say that and then I read that she was Black, and that’s OK. Either one was OK with me.” The NYT calls that false. I’d say it needs context. Because when she was elected to Congress it was made a big deal that she was the first Indian Senator ever elected. I saw her on a cooking show as a guest. The host was Indian. Kamala flat out said she was Indian. She went on to talk about dinners her mom made and how she grew up with Indian food. So he is partially right, but the context is needed. The NYT fact checker didn’t want to find those things so they didn’t. It’s better to call Trump a liar.

The list goes on. 33 fact checks of Trump, 10 for Kamala. And I identified 8, most of which they ignored. When they did fact check Kamala, they would frequently say “Needs context”. They would then go on and talk about how what she said was completely false.

I’d suggest you go back to the debate, take it slow and do your own fact checking. Did Trump lie and/or exaggerate? Sure. But not nearly as much as what the “fact checkers” from the MSM say. And did Harris lie and/or exaggerate? Absolutely. And far more than any of the “fact checkers” from the MSM say.

As for him “stacking the SCOTUS”...tell me how? He didn’t create new SCOTUS positions…he wouldn’t have the power for that. He replaced retiring or dying justices. He can’t predict when a justice will die or when they will retire. He nominated 3 justices to fill open slots on the SCOTUS. But that is only the first part. He can’t hand select someone and just put them into place. They have to go through a rigorous vetting process and then have to get questioned and eventually approved by the Senate for them to get onto the SCOTUS. Did he nominate? Absolutely…that is his job. Did he nominate conservative justices? Sure. Just like the Dems always push leftist justices. So don’t get bunched up about that. Those justices were not put into place by the POTUS either. They were nominated, but still had to get vetted and approved. See…this is where it gets to be that Kamala lied. He didn’t put the justices onto the SCOTUS, the Senate did. And there is zero evidence…NONE…that Trump nominated any of them because of their stance on abortion.

You need to step back a little and do some research. Avoid the MSM as your sources since they all lie. You might use them as a beginning point but then dig down deeper. When you see things like “Trump stacked the SCOTUS…” you know it is a lie. He couldn’t do that. That is the beginning of a spin. When you see something like that, see how much of their reporting revolves around that spin which is, in effect, only opinion or propaganda.

Response moderated (Unhelpful)
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated (Off-Topic)
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
MrGrimm888's avatar

Back to the subject (ahem,) Harris “accepted an invitation for a second debate, on CNN.”

Should Trump first have scheduled a second debate on FOX, rather than avoiding it?

Response moderated
Response moderated
seawulf575's avatar

@MrGrimm888 Your facts are a bit off. Harris didn’t accept a second debate, she proposed a second debate. Trump rejected it. And given the controversy of the ABC debate, I can understand why. My initial answer to this question pointed out that Harris/Walz were already pushing for another debate the day after the first one. Trump rejected it at that point. He rejected this latest frantic effort by Harris as well. I did mention in my first response to this question that if there was to be a second debate with Harris, Trump ought to argue that since the Dems got to name the venue, and the rules of the first two debates, he ought to be the one to name the terms of the next. That would remove the argument that Harris is a go-getter and wants to show the world how great she is. He’d recommend the same rules, but with Fox or Newsmax being the moderators. She’d refuse in a heartbeat. They won’t help her cheat.

Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
Response moderated
MrGrimm888's avatar

Wulf. I put it in quotes, because I am very aware that it probably was just a way to try and make Trump look bad, because he certainly wouldn’t accept a CNN debate anymore than she a FOX debate.
It stinks of political theater, to me.

That being said, I think if there are additional debates, I believe they should be in a neutral venue, like (I know you disagree but,) ABC again…

SavoirFaire's avatar

@seawulf575 “1) Donald Trump wants a 20% sales tax on all goods people buy.”

Debate quote: “My opponent has a plan that I call the Trump sales tax, which would be a 20% tax on everyday goods that you rely on to get through the month.”

Harris isn’t saying that Trump literally wants a 20% sales tax. She is characterizing his tariff policies as being essentially a sales tax in light of the fact that tariffs always get passed on to consumers. She said much the same thing in her speech at the DNC:

“He intends to enact what, in effect, is a national sales tax—call it, a Trump tax—that would raise prices on middle-class families by almost four thousand dollars a year.”

Trump even acknowledges that she’s talking about tariffs in his response, but he then goes on to falsely imply that tariffs are paid by the exporter when they are actually paid for by the importer (who then passes it on to the consumer). So while it may be reasonable to do a cost-benefit analysis of particular tariffs, a 20% tariff on imports across the board would undoubtedly and inexorably lead to a corresponding increase in prices on many goods, including some of those “everyday goods” that Harris mentions.

So while pointing out that the tariff proposal is effectively a sales tax may be a bit of a branding exercise on Harris’ part, it is neither a caricature nor a lie.

“2) Donald Trump left us the worst unemployment since the Great Depression”

Debate quote: “Donald Trump left us the worst unemployment since the Great Depression.”

Yeah, this one is a lie. While it is true that unemployment reached it’s highest level since the Great Depression under Trump (14.8% in April 2020 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 14.7% according to some other sources), it was not that high when Biden took office in January 2021. And while it is also true that each of the last three Republican presidents have left their successors with higher unemployment rates than the ones they inherited (and the last three Democratic presidents have left their successors with lower unemployment rates than they inherited—a trend that Biden will almost certainly continue), both George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush left their successors with higher unemployment rates than Trump did.

It’s also worth noting that Carter just barely squeaked by on this metric, and Reagan—under whom we saw the second highest unemployment rate since the Great Depression—left office with lower unemployment than he inherited despite sharp increases earlier in his presidency.

“3) Project 2025 is Trump’s plan”

Debate quote: “What you’re going to hear tonight is a detailed and dangerous plan called Project 2025 that the former president intends on implementing if he were elected again.”

Project 2025 was created by the Heritage Foundation in collaboration with former (and likely future, if he is re-elected) Trump staffers and officials. In fact, 28 of the plan’s 38 primary authors worked for the Trump administration. And here is what Trump said about Project 2025 at a Heritage Foundation event:

“The critical job of institutions such as Heritage is to lay the groundwork, and Heritage does such an incredible job at that. This is a great group, and they’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America. And that’s coming. That’s coming.”

He started saying he had never heard of it when the project became controversial, but those still working on the project say that is just a political move. Here is Russell Vought (Trump’s former OMB director) on the disavowals:

“He’s running against the brand. He is not running against any people. He is not running against any institutions. It’s interesting. He’s in fact not even opposing himself to a particular policy. He’s been at our organization, he’s raised money for our organization, he’s blessed it from the, you know, I remember walking into our last day in office and told him what I was going to do. So he’s very supportive of what we do.”

There’s also the fact that Trump’s transition is being run by the America First Policy Institute, the president and CEO of which is Brooke Rollins—who is closely tied to Kevin Roberts, the current president of both the Heritage Foundation and the Project 2025 Presidential Transition Project.

But most importantly: if you read through the document, there’s a lot of overlap between what it proposes and what Trump has endorsed on the campaign trail. So while it may not be Trump’s plan in the sense that he didn’t personally create it, that’s not what Harris said. She said he plans to implement it, and there’s no reason to think that’s not a very likely outcome were Trump to be re-elected.

“4) Donald Trump hand selected 3 SCOTUS justices with the express purpose of overturning Roe v Wade. (POTUS nominates, Senate has to approve so this is already deceptive. There is no evidence anywhere that Trump ever even discussed RvW with any of his three appointments).”

Debate quote: “Donald Trump hand-selected three members of the United States Supreme Court with the intention that they would undo the protections of Roe v. Wade.”

This is a reference to Trump’s explicit statements prior to being elected in 2016 that he would choose pro-life Supreme Court Justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade, such as this exchange from his October 19, 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton:

Chris Wallace: “Do you want to see the court overturn Roe v. Wade?”
Donald Trump: “Well, if we put another two or perhaps three justices on, that’s really what’s going to be—that will happen. And that’ll happen automatically, in my opinion, because I am putting pro-life justices on the court.”

Whether or not he specifically discussed it with them is irrelevant because he selected his nominees from a list provided by the Federalist Society (which used whether or not a potential Justice would would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade as a criterion in its vetting process).

“5) She said there there were 20 states with Trump abortion bans. There is no such thing.”

Debate quote: “And now in over 20 states there are Trump abortion bans.”

The phrase “Trump abortion bans” refers to bans that are only in effect because of actions taken by Trump when he was president. At present, 21 states have laws that were unconstitutional under Roe, and Roe was only overturned because he appointed three justices to the Supreme Court (justices who, as noted above, were selected specifically to do so). As Trump has happily taken credit for Roe being overturned, he must also take credit for the consequences of that outcome. It is therefore not unfair to attribute these bans to him. Yes, many are the result of trigger laws. But the existence of those trigger laws was public knowledge when he chose to appoint justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade.

“6) She claims Trump wants no exceptions for abortions due to rape or incest. This had been debunked many times.”

Debate quote: “And now in over 20 states there are Trump abortion bans which make it criminal for a doctor or nurse to provide health care. In one state it provides prison for life. Trump abortion bans that make no exception even for rape and incest.”

Looking at the actual quote from the debate, Harris did not say this. What she said is that some of those 20 states have bans that do not make these exceptions. This is true. Furthermore, the bans that do not make these exceptions are the ones that took effect due to trigger laws. So the consequences of triggering those bans were known in advance, and he proceeded to further the overturning of Roe anyway. It seems perfectly fair, then, for Harris to point out the consequences of his actions—actions that he took deliberately and then happily associated himself with in the aftermath.

“7) She claims for a second time (even after being corrected the first time) that Trump’s plan is Project 2025.”

Debate quote: ” Understand in his Project 2025 there would be a national abortion ban.”

See above. He endorsed the plan before it became controversial, it is widely seen as being a blueprint should he be reelected, and there is good reason to believe that his denials are just political cover.

“8) She claims Trump would outlaw IVF as part of his abortion ban.”

Debate quote: “And understand what has been happening under Donald Trump’s abortion bans. Couples who pray and dream of having a family are being denied IVF treatments.”

Again, Harris didn’t say this. What she said is that IVF treatments have been denied to some people due to abortion bans triggered by Trump. This is true. After the Supreme Court of Alabama ruled that IVF violates state law, many couples were denied treatment. And that ruling was based on a law that would not have been constitutional under Roe. The Alabama legislature passed a law granting immunity to IVF providers soon after, but it did not actually undo the court’s ruling. The US Supreme Court also rejected the appeal made to it by the clinic involved in the original lawsuit. The fact of the matter is that IVF and abortion have been tied together by pro-life activists for decades (you may remember that it was also an issue during the presidency of George W. Bush), and many continue to fight for the criminalization of IVF. So not only is what Harris said true, we should not think that the issue is resolved just because of a single damage control bill passed in an election year.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther